Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

other Versions

PDF
Does sweat volume influence the sweat test result?
  1. Shmuel Goldberg1,*,
  2. Shepard Schwartz2,
  3. Francis Mimouni2,
  4. Halina Stankiewicz3,
  5. Gabriel Izbicki4,
  6. Elie Picard1
  1. 1 Pediatric Pulmonology ,Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel;
  2. 2 Departments of Pediatrics, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel;
  3. 3 Gastroenterology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel;
  4. 4 Pulmononary Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel
  1. Correspondence to: Shmuel Goldberg, Pediatric Pulmonology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, POB 3232, Jerusalem, 91031, Israel; sgoldberg{at}szmc.org.il

Abstract

Objective: Sweat samples of low volume are considered unreliable for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, based on the assertion that sweat conductivity and chloride are reduced at lower sweating rates. We aimed to reevaluate the relationship between sweat volume and test results.

Design: We reviewed all sweat tests performed in our institution to assess the relationship between sweat volume and conductivity, and between sweat volume and sweat chloride. We also compared results between pairs of sweat tests taken simultaneously from a single patient, one with sweat volume below and the other above the currently accepted minimum volume (15μl).

Results: A weak inverse relationship between sweat volume and sweat conductivity was found (n=1500, R2=0.105, p<0.001). There was no correlation between sweat volume and sweat chloride (n=463, R2= 0.002, p>0.05). In discordant pairs, one below and one exceeding the accepted minimum volume, the mean test result in the low volume sample was slightly higher than its counterpart. In 76 such pairs, mean conductivity was 41.1±14.6 mmol/L in the lower volume sample, compared to 36.8±16.0 mmol/L in the higher volume sample (p<0.001). Similarly, in 33 of the pairs, mean sweat chloride was 28.4±15.7 mmol/L in the lower volume sample compared to 25.1±15.2 mmol/L in the higher volume sample (p=0.004).

Conclusion: A normal sweat conductivity and/or chloride value from a sweat volume less that 15μl in a patient whose clinical symptoms are not very suggestive of CF, renders this diagnosis unlikely. In contrast, elevated sweat chloride or conductivity measured from a sample whose volume is below 15μl may represent an artifact related to the low volume.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Linked Articles

    • Miscellanea
      BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health