Article Text

other Versions

PDF
How well do vital signs identify children with serious infections in paediatric emergency care?
  1. Matthew James Thompson (matthew.thompson{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk)
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
    1. Nigel Coad (nigel.coad{at}uhcw.nhs.uk)
    1. Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, United Kingdom
      1. Anthony Harnden (anthony.harnden{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk)
      1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
        1. Richard Mayon-White (richard.mayon-white{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk)
        1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
          1. Rafael Perera (rafael.perera{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk)
          1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
            1. David Mant (david.mant{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk)
            1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom

              Abstract

              Objectives: To determine whether vital signs identify children with serious infections, and to compare their diagnostic value with that of the Manchester triage score (MTS) and NICE traffic light system of clinical risk factors.

              Design: Prospective cohort of children presenting with suspected acute infection. We recorded vital signs, level of consciousness, activity level, respiratory distress, hydration, and MTS category.

              Setting: Paediatric assessment unit at a teaching hospital in England.

              Participants: 700 children (median age 3 years), of whom 357 (51.0%) were referred from primary care, 198 (28.3%) self-referrals, and 116 (16.6%) emergency ambulance transfers. Just over half (383 or 54.7%) were admitted.

              Main outcome measures: Severity of infection categorised as serious, intermediate, minor, or not infection.

              Results: Children with serious or intermediate infections (n=313) were significantly more likely than those with minor or no infection (n=387) to have temperature ≥ 39°C, tachycardia, saturations ≤ 94%, or CRT >2sec. Having one or more of temperature ≥ 39°C, saturations ≤ 94%, tachycardia, and tachypnoea was 80% (95%CI 75-85) sensitive and 39% (95%CI 34-44) specific for serious or intermediate infection. This was comparable to the MTS score (84% sensitive, 38% specific), and the NICE traffic light system (85% sensitive, 29% specific).

              Conclusions: A combination of vital signs can be used to differentiate children with serious infections from those with less serious infections in a paediatric assessment unit and may have comparable sensitivity to more complicated triage systems. The diagnostic value of combined vital signs and the NICE traffic light system remains to be determined in populations where the prevalence of severe illness is much lower.

              Statistics from Altmetric.com

              Request permissions

              If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.