Article Text

other Versions

PDF
A Way To Restore British Paediatricians’ Engagement With Child Protection
  1. Ben Mathews (b.mathews{at}qut.edu.au)
  1. Queensland University of Technology, Australia
    1. Heather Payne
    1. Cardiff University, United Kingdom
      1. Catherine Bonnet
      1. Private consultant, France
        1. David Chadwick
        1. Medical consultant in child abuse paediatrics, United States

          Abstract

          This article draws on international evidence to propose a solution to a key problem affecting UK paediatricians and child protection. Disciplinary actions brought by the General Medical Council against doctors for their testimony in, and or reporting of, cases of suspected child abuse, have caused damaging consequences for the profession and, worse, for child protection. Because of these cases and mounting numbers of complaints, paediatricians are less likely to report suspected child abuse, and are less willing to accept leading child protection roles. This problem demands a solution. Informed by a comparative analysis, this article suggests that enacting a legislative immunity for paediatricians from legal and administrative proceedings where a report of suspected child abuse is made in good faith, is required to restore paediatricians’ willingness to report suspected child abuse and engage in child protection work.

          Statistics from Altmetric.com

          Request permissions

          If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

          Linked Articles

          • Atoms
            Howard Bauchner