Article Text

PS-103 Heart Rate In Infants At Birth Is Lower Measured By Pulse Oximetry When Compared With Electrocardiography
  1. J van Vonderen1,
  2. SB Hooper2,
  3. JK Kroese1,
  4. IC Narayen1,
  5. AB te Pas1
  1. 1Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
  2. 2The Ritchie Center, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Background and aim Heart rate (HR) is the most important parameter for evaluation of infants at birth. Studies using pulse oximetry (PO) have shown that healthy (pre)term infants can be bradycardic at birth. While HRs measured with PO (HRPO) and ECG (HRECG) have been compared, time after birth was not a factor in the analysis. We compared HRECG and HRPO at specific time points after birth, hypothesising that a discrepancy may exist immediately after birth.

Methods ECG electrodes and a PO sensor were attached as soon as possible after birth in healthy pre (term) infants. PO data with Signal Identification and Quality <0.30 were excluded. HRECG and HRPO were compared every 30 s from 1–10 min.

Results 755 data pairs of 53 patients were analysed. Median (range) gestational age was 36 (27–41) weeks. Data from ECG and PO were acquired from 82 (26) and 99 (33)s after birth. Median HRPO was <100 bpm the first 2 min after which it rapidly increased. HRECG remained stable at 150–160 bpm (table).

Conclusion HR measured by PO is significantly lower compared to ECG, which has important implications for clinical care in the first minutes after birth.

Abstract PS-103 Table 1

Median (IQR) HR (bpm) over time (** = p < 0.001, * = p < 0.05).

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.