Article Text

PDF
G272(P) Designing Supervised Learning Event tools: the new Safeguarding Case Based Discussion and Discussion of Communication (DOC)
  1. LAC Menzies1,2,
  2. D James2,3,
  3. C Hands1,2,
  4. C Fertleman1,2
  1. 1Paediatric Dept, Whittington Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2 London School of Paediatrics, London, UK
  3. 3Assessment Methodology Working Group, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, London, UK

Abstract

Aims Despite initial promise, Workplace Based Assessments (WPBAs) have been criticised for failing to discriminate between trainees. With a largely summative component they have often been viewed as tick-box exercises of limited learning value1. Increasingly, reflection and good quality formative feedback are considered essential elements of medical learning2,3. We wanted paediatric trainees to be involved in designing new WPBAs that allow trainees to learn more from feedback and reflection, and remove the summative aspect of assessments.

Methods Two areas for improvement were identified through discussion with trainees: safeguarding and written communication. Evidence of safeguarding experience and competence is becoming increasingly important, and yet was often challenging for trainees to bring to the summative Case Based Discussion (CBD) environment. The paper-based Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL) was felt to be outdated and did not demonstrate adequate flexibility with the many forms of communication which trainees now use such as email for social care referrals. Two new tools were designed in conjunction with the RCPCH Assessment Methodology Working Group.

Results The new assessment tools, Safeguarding CBD and Discussion of Correspondence (DOC) have subsequently been incorporated into the GMC-approved national assessment pilot. This new assessment style, referred to as ‘Supervised Learning Events’ (SLEs) allows trainees to select a learning opportunity from their own clinical practice and discuss this freely with a trainer, focussing on agreed learning objectives, and providing a forum for reflection unhampered by summative assessment.

Conclusion These new tools will be evaluated and refined during the 2013–14 RCPCH Assessment National Pilot through focus groups and surveys. This was a fantastic opportunity for us as trainees to engage in a national policy development process. We hope that trainees will be involved in the evaluation of the new SLEs and to assist the RCPCH to continue its work to make SLEs a seamless part of training and professional development.

References

  1. Macaulay C, Winyard P. Reflection: tick-box exercise or learning for all? British Medical Journal 2012:Nov 12.

  2. GMC. Good Medical Practice 2013.

  3. Goodyear HM, Bindal T, Wall D. How useful are structured electronic portfolio templates to encourage reflective practice? Medical Teacher 2013;35:71–73.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.