Article Text


G170 Randomised Controlled Trial of Synchronised Intermittent Positive Airway Pressure (SiPAP™) Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) as a Primary Mode of Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  1. FE Wood1,
  2. S Gupta2,
  3. W Tin1,
  4. S Sinha1
  1. 1Department of Neonatal Medicine, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
  2. 2Department of Neonatal Medicine, University Hospital of North Tees & Durham University, Stockton, UK


Background Minimising exposure to factors contributing to chronic respiratory morbidity is a priority in preterm care. CPAP is established but alternatives are gaining popularity despite limited evaluation. SiPAP has not previously been compared to CPAP for first-line treatment of RDS.

Aims To compare SiPAP with CPAP as a primary mode of non-invasive respiratory support in premature infants with RDS.

Methods In this prospective two-centre trial, infants (GA 28+0 to 31+6; inborn; <6hrs old; no prior intubation; no major congenital disorders) were assigned to either SiPAP (BiPhasic Tr©) or CPAP delivered by the Infant Flow® SiPAP device. Randomisation was stratified by centre and gestation. Crossover or use of other devices was not permitted.

The primary outcome was a pre-defined failure of non-invasive respiratory support, necessitating intubation and ventilation, in the first 72 hours of treatment. Strategies for initial settings, weaning, discontinuation and deterioration were specified. To detect a 50% reduction in failure (power 80%, α = 0.05, 2 tailed), 116 participants were required. Analyses were by intention-to-treat.

Results We assessed 368 infants at admission and recruited 120 of 149 eligible (CPAP 60, SiPAP 60). Baseline characteristics were comparable.

Abstract G170 Table 1

Failure of non-invasive respiratory support, did not differ by allocated mode of respiratory support but occurred more frequently in the lower gestational age stratum (GA < 30+0) (p = 0.004). Despite differing frequencies for some key morbidities there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes.

Abstract G170 Table 2

Conclusions For the very preterm infant, using SiPAP for first-line treatment of RDS does not confer any benefit in short-term respiratory outcome as compared to CPAP. Preterm morbidities and complications of non-invasive respiratory support were similar irrespective of allocation in this study.

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.