Article Text

PDF

G240 The ROMLA Matrices as a Tool in Investigating Guideline Adherence and Clinical Outcome: Are They Useful in Children with Head Injuries?
  1. S Winearls1,
  2. D Matheson2,
  3. D Roland3
  1. 1Emergency Department, Wanganui Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand
  2. 2Medical Education, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK
  3. 3Paediatric Emergency Medicine Leicester Academic (PEMLA) Group, Leicester University, Leicester, UK

Abstract

Background Paediatric head Injuries (HI) are a common presentation to emergency departments. National guidance is available to facilitate neuroimaging decision making in this cohort. However it is unclear how guidelines and their evidence base influence practise and patient outcomes. The ROMLA matrices are 2X2 classification algorithms relating evidence base adherence to either diagnostic accuracy (Rolma 1) or clinical outcome (Rolma 2).

Abstract G240 Table 1

The Rolma Matrices

The aim of this study was to trial the feasibility of the ROLMA matrices as a methodological frame work to explore the interplay between guidelines and clinical practise.

Method The notes for 100 HI patients were reviewed. The assessing clinician’s evaluation and management were assessed for guideline concordance and the eventual outcome was recorded. Qualitative notes were also taken. The ROMLA matrices were applied and linked to the qualitative notes.

Results In this sample the ROLMA matrices did not show a clear relationship between guideline concordance and diagnostic accuracy. The ROLMA matrix did however provide a framework for assessing compliance with guidelines and whether or not non-compliance with guidelines is related to inaccurate assessment or even adverse outcome (Table 2 and 3). Even in this small group the ROLMA matrices provided a mechanism for identifying and categorising guideline non-adherence, and identifying adverse events so that this can be fed back to clinicians. The data set is particularly informative when combined with qualitative data.

Conclusion The ROLMA matrices provide a conceptual framework to understand the interplay between evidence base, expertise and outcome. They are useful audit tools on a departmental level to categorise guideline non-adherence and relate this to potential adverse events such as, in this study, unnecessary irradiation. The ROLMA matrix shows promise as a tool for a larger study to detect associations between adverse events and clinicians practise.

Abstract G240 Table 2
Abstract G240 Table 3

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.