rss
Arch Dis Child 98:3-8 doi:10.1136/archdischild-2012-301659
  • Original articles

How training affects Australian paediatricians’ management of obesity

  1. Louise A Baur7
  1. 1Centre for Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2Community Child Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4Swansea University, Swansea, UK
  5. 5Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  6. 6Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  7. 7The Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Professor Melissa Wake, Centre for Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; melissa.wake{at}rch.org.au
  • Received 10 January 2012
  • Revised 7 June 2012
  • Accepted 11 June 2012
  • Published Online First 13 July 2012

Abstract

Objective Secondary care could be the optimal sector for managing child and adolescent obesity, given low primary care uptake and limited tertiary services. We aimed to determine Australian paediatricians’ self-reported competence and training in managing obesity and, in a linked patient-level audit, whether these predict rates of measurement and obesity diagnosis.

Design, setting and patients Australian Paediatric Research Network members completed an online survey, plus a prospective patient-level audit of up to 100 consecutive consultations over 2 weeks.

Main outcome measures Survey: self-reported competencies, training in and use of clinical skills in obesity and its comorbidities. Audit: paediatricians reported each child's height, weight, age, sex and diagnoses including overweight/obesity.

Results Of 166 (44.7% response) paediatricians, most felt very/quite competent in assessing (89%) and managing (68%) obesity, but few in making a difference to obesity (20%) or managing hypertension (45%), insulin resistance (32%), fatty liver disease (22%) or dyslipidaemia (21%). The audit of 200 (66.2% response) paediatricians included 8345 patients. On average paediatricians recorded height and weight for 66.5% of patients (SD 30.0%, range 0–100%). Of the 296 (12.3%) patients obese by CDC cutpoints, 118 (39.9%) were diagnosed as obese; perceived competence increased the odds of recording this diagnosis but not measurement. Training levels were low, showed little association with measurement or obesity diagnosis, and skills learnt were not routinely used.

Conclusions There is a clear need for better paediatrician training in obesity management. However, care and outcomes for obese children are unlikely to improve unless effective management models can be operationalised systematically.

Relevant Article