Article Text


343 A Randomised Trial of Two Techniques of Bottle Feeding for Preterm Infants
  1. JA Dawson1,2,3,
  2. LR Myers1,
  3. A Moorhead1,
  4. SE Jacobs1,2,3,
  5. K Ong4,
  6. F Salo1,2,3,
  7. PG Davis1,2,3
  1. 1The Royal Women’s Hospital
  2. 2Murdoch Children’s Research Institute
  3. 3University of Melbourne
  4. 4Royal Childrens Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia


Background and Aims Preterm infants will begin the transition from tube to suck feeds at ~34 weeks’ corrected age. Our aim was to compare physiological stability in two positions for bottle feeding preterm infants, the “cradle hold” versus a “side-lying” position.

Methods Randomised crossover trial of infants < 34 weeks’ gestation at birth, ≥ 34 weeks’ corrected gestation at study, receiving ≥ two sucking feeds/day. Feeds were studied on successive days. A pulse oximeter (PO) measured oxygen saturation (SpO2) and heart rate(HR), before, during and for 30 minutes after feeds. Continuous data were compared with paired t-tests, proportions compared with Χ2.

Results 25 study infants were, mean (SD) 29(3)weeks gestation and 1158(479)g at birth and mean (SD) 37(2.4) wks corrected age and 2740 (589)g at study.

Abstract 343 Table 1

Eight study infants were receiving oxygen or respiratory support. In these 8 infants 5/8 (62%) versus 7/8 (87%) in side and cradle feeding positions experienced a SpO2 < 80% (p=0.25) during study feeds.

Conclusions Little difference in physiological stability was seen between the two bottle feeding positions. Both methods may be appropriate for the transition from tube to bottle feeding in preterm infants.

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.