Article Text

PDF
A review of blood pressure measurement practice in paediatric units in North East England
  1. J Stojanovic,
  2. Y Tse,
  3. N Moghal
  1. Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK

Abstract

Aim To measure the variation in practice of blood pressure measurement in paediatric units in a defined region.

Methods All district general hospitals and the tertiary centre were contacted by telephone to identify what equipment is used; who measures; how is the data interpreted; do all children have blood pressure (BP) measurement in the in-patient (IP) and out-patient (OP) facilities.

Results In one IP facility, children with kidney disease are measured using an auscultatory method and all other children measured using oscilometric technique (table 1 and 2).

Abstract G223(P) Table 1
Abstract G223(P) Table 2

Assessing results (figure 1).

Who gets measured

IP

  • 13 units: All children get a BP measure

  • In one unit: Children with renal, cardiac, endocrine or cerebral disease

OP

  • One unit: All children

  • One unit: Children seen for UTIs, migraine, epilepsy or ADHD

  • One unit: Children with cardiac, renal, endocrine, cerebral disease

  • One unit: Routinely for UTIs or obesity

  • All the rest do not routinely measure unless requested by the pediatrician

Tertiary centre - 11 different machines (9 oscillometric) in 8 facilities sampled.

Conclusions The variation identified includes: type of equipment used; who measures; criteria for measuring; source of reference data. BP is not universally measured. Variation was found between units, within one hospital and within one ward. BP measurement with oscillometric equipment is unreliable, especially in children; uncertainty about the values obtained requires repeat measuring using the more accurate auscultatory technique. Units have made decisions about whether to measure, what equipment to use and generate BP data of uncertain value. Variation in practice occurs because there is no standard to adhere to, can not be adhered, or system assumptions about good practice or process. If measuring BP is a valid and necessary measure of physiology we should, based on existing evidence, be able to reach consensus as to what constitutes a good process.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.