Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Editorial
Off-label drug use in children should be rational
  1. Maurizio Bonati,
  2. Chiara Pandolfini
  1. Department of Public Health, Laboratory for Mother and Child Health, ‘Mario Negri’ Pharmacological Research Institute, Milan, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Maurizio Bonati, Head, Department of Public Health, Laboratory for Mother and Child Health, ‘Mario Negri’ Pharmacological Research Institute, Via Giuseppe La Masa 19, 20156 Milan, Italy; mother_child{at}marionegri.it

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The drug authorisation process was introduced in the 1960s to ensure that only quality drugs with proven safety and efficacy enter the market.1 The process was introduced as a response to adverse drug reactions that occurred, in particular, in adults, and also after the chloramphenicol and thalidomide tragedies that occurred in newborn infants. The procedures, initially defined by the Food and Drug Administration and later also by other national and European regulatory agencies, were improved over time. In general, when a pharmaceutical company submits an application to the licensing authority, safety and efficacy data originating mainly from formal clinical trials have to be provided. However, this is not always the case with children, who are routinely given drugs in an ‘off-label’ manner, as was documented for the first time in Europe in the 1980s.2

Although the precise definitions have changed from author to author and over time, in general, off-label drug use is the practice of prescribing drugs outside their authorised indications with respect to dosage, age, indication or route, and unlicensed drugs are those that are prepared as extemporaneous preparations, which are imported or used before an authorisation (license) is granted, or are chemicals …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.