Article Text

PDF
Medication access in primary care for paediatric home-patients: involvement and opinions of medical staff in a UK paediatric hospital
  1. D R P Terry1,
  2. A G Sinclair1,
  3. J F Marriott2,
  4. K A Wilson2,
  5. P Davis1
  1. 1Birmingham Children's Hospital (BCH), Birmingham, UK
  2. 2Aston University, Birmingham, UK

Abstract

Objective To identify the involvement and opinions of hospital medical staff in supporting medication access for paediatric home-patients. We define a home-patient as a patient not in hospital and largely cared for by primary care services where prescribing responsibility remains with the GP.

Methods Descriptive, cross-sectional survey using an electronic questionnaire constructed and piloted with the support of hospital doctors, using LimeSurvey software (version 1.71) and sent via hospital email addresses to all medical staff (n=340) at Birmingham Children's Hospital. The survey was tokenised to ensure that one invitation elicited one response only and sent commencing January 2010 with two reminders if necessary. The 30 point questionnaire included: demographics; frequency of prescribing; reasons for medication access problems; interaction with community pharmacists; and improving current arrangements. Responses were entered into MS Excel 2003 and SPSS v16 for analysis. Service costs are based on a fee of £26 per telephone consultations: confirmed as appropriate by the Department of Health (Commissioning Department Birmingham Children's Hospital to D Terry, personal communication).

Results Response rate of 48.5% (n=165) from 24 paediatric specialties. Nearly half of respondents (n=81) wrote urgent prescriptions for home-patients in a 3 month period. Respondents providing this service describe the clinical risk to patients if they did not provide this service as: small 9.2% (n=7); moderate 46.1% (n=35); high 35.5% (n=27); very high 9.2% (n=7). Respondents were asked to identify the most likely reason for medication access problems from a list of possible reasons with the following results: GP issue 44.5% (n=65); Communication issue 17.1% (n=25); Carer issue 13.0% (n=19); Pharmacy issue 6.2% (n=9); Formulation issue 1.4% (n=2). Respondents were asked to assess the likelihood (very unlikely, quite unlikely, sometimes, quite likely, very likely) of a list of possible reasons why GPs may decline to provide repeat prescriptions for children with the following results for very likely or quite likely: clinical concerns 56% (n=84); communication issues 52% (n=78); PCT influence 47.3% (n=71). Annual service costs for this institution are estimated as £120 000.

Conclusion Hospital doctors act frequently to assist paediatric patients outside hospital who are largely cared for by primary care services (home-patients) to obtain the medicines they need. This activity is not covered by existing contractual arrangements between the hospital and PCTs. The most common reason for this activity cited by respondents is GP issues, prompted by clinical concerns. Require GPs to prescribe all continuing medicines was considered to be a high or very high benefit by over 60% of respondents: a view similar to that of hospital nurses.1 Hospital and community pharmacists will benefit from being aware of this activity, perceived clinical importance and service costs.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.