Article Text

PDF
Distinguishing infant prolonged crying from sleep-waking problems
  1. Ian St James-Roberts1,
  2. Emma Peachey2
  1. 1Thomas Coram Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Psychology & Human Development, Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Ian St James-Roberts, Thomas Coram Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 27–28 Woburn Square, London WC1H 0AA, UK; i.stjamesroberts{at}ioe.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective Infants who cry a lot, or are unsettled in the night, are common sources of concern for parents and costly problems for health services. The two types of problems have been linked together and attributed to a general disturbance of infant regulation. Yet the infant behaviours involved present differently, at separate ages and times of day. To clarify causation, this study aims to assess whether prolonged crying at 5–6 weeks (the peak age for crying) predicts which infants are unsettled in the night at 12 weeks of age (when most infants become settled at night).

Methods Data from two longitudinal studies are analysed. Infant crying data were obtained from validated behaviour diaries; sleep-waking data from standard parental questionnaires.

Results A significant, weak relationship was found between crying at 5–6 weeks and 12-week night waking and signalling in one study, but not the other. Most infants who met the definition for prolonged crying/colic at 5–6 weeks were settled during the night at 12 weeks of age; they were not more likely than other infants to be unsettled.

Conclusions Most infants who cry a lot at 5–6 weeks of age ‘sleep through the night’ at 12 weeks of age. This adds to evidence that the two types of problematic behaviour have different causes, and that infant sleep-waking problems usually involve maintenance of signalling behaviours rather than a generalised disturbance.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding The research included in this article was supported by Wellcome Trust Project Grant 065486, Department of Health NHSE grant MCH0906, and by the Danish Council for the Humanities.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Hammersmith and QCH Medical Research Ethics Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.