Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Portacaths are safe for long-term regular blood transfusion in children with sickle cell anaemia
  1. Jack L Bartram1,
  2. Sandra O'Driscoll1,
  3. Austin G Kulasekararaj2,
  4. Susan E Height1,
  5. Moira Dick1,
  6. Shailesh Patel3,
  7. David C Rees1
  1. 1Department of Paediatric Haematology, King's College London School of Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Haematological Medicine, King's College London School of Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
  3. 3Department of Paediatric Surgery, King's College London School of Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jack L Bartram, Department of Paediatric Haematology, King's College London School of Medicine, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK; jacklbartram{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

Peripheral venous access in children with sickle cell anaemia (SCA) requiring regular blood transfusions can become difficult over time. Previous reports have suggested the use of totally implantable venous access devices, Portacaths (PAC) in this patient group are associated with unacceptable high rates of complications. We present our experience in seven children with SCA over a 9-year period. Seven devices were placed for a total of 9754 PAC days during the study period. The median age at insertion was 6.3 years (range 3–15 years). The rate of PAC associated infection was 0.2 per 1000 PAC days. There were no episodes of thrombosis. The median length of time in situ during the study period was 3.7 years (range 1.3–7.5 years). Our experience highlights the safe and reliable use of PAC in children with SCA requiring regular blood transfusions when venous access has become a major problem.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    This study was an audit and was approved as an audit by the King's College Hospital audit committee.