rss
Arch Dis Child 2009;94:817-820 doi:10.1136/adc.2008.149823
  • Short report

Making choices: why parents present to the emergency department for non-urgent care

  1. A Williams1,
  2. P O’Rourke2,
  3. S Keogh1
  1. 1
    Nursing Research Unit, Royal Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  2. 2
    Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Ms A Williams, Nursing Research, Ground Floor, North Tower, Royal Children’s Hospital, Herston Road, Herston 4029, Queensland, Australia; alison_williams{at}health.qld.gov.au
  • Accepted 8 April 2009
  • Published Online First 23 April 2009

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to provide a better understanding of the motivations and actions of parents of children with non-urgent injury or illness who attend the emergency department at a tertiary paediatric hospital seeking care.

Design: A prospective questionnaire-based survey of 355 parents aimed to ascertain information about parent care-giving and care-seeking behaviours prior to presentation at the emergency department with their child.

Results: A total of 355 parents were surveyed, representing 8% of the parents/carers presenting to the emergency department in a 3-month period for non-urgent (Australasian Triage System 4 and 5) care of their child. The factors identified were: parents rated their child’s condition as moderate to very serious (242 (68%)); two-thirds of parents (234 (66%)) had sought advice prior to attending the emergency department; 54% (77) of the 137 children who attended with an injury presented promptly to emergency (ie, within 4 h of injury) whereas of the 216 presenting with an illness, 41% (88) presented within 2–7 days of the onset of the illness.

Conclusions: This study displayed the accuracy of “parental triage,” that is, parents assess their child’s health and generally engage in appropriate care-giving and care-seeking behaviours before presenting to a paediatric emergency department. Highlighted are the deficiencies in current primary care services available to families and the perception that not all cases deemed as non-urgent by the emergency department are able to be dealt with in a primary care setting.

Footnotes

  • Funding The chief investigator was awarded a scholarship to undertake this study by the Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation, Brisbane.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the Royal Children’s Hospital, Ethics Committee and University of Queensland Ethics Committee.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Responses to this article

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics