Making choices: why parents present to the emergency department for non-urgent care
- 1Nursing Research Unit, Royal Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- 2Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Correspondence to Ms A Williams, Nursing Research, Ground Floor, North Tower, Royal Children’s Hospital, Herston Road, Herston 4029, Queensland, Australia; alison_williams{at}health.qld.gov.au
- Accepted 8 April 2009
- Published Online First 23 April 2009
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to provide a better understanding of the motivations and actions of parents of children with non-urgent injury or illness who attend the emergency department at a tertiary paediatric hospital seeking care.
Design: A prospective questionnaire-based survey of 355 parents aimed to ascertain information about parent care-giving and care-seeking behaviours prior to presentation at the emergency department with their child.
Results: A total of 355 parents were surveyed, representing 8% of the parents/carers presenting to the emergency department in a 3-month period for non-urgent (Australasian Triage System 4 and 5) care of their child. The factors identified were: parents rated their child’s condition as moderate to very serious (242 (68%)); two-thirds of parents (234 (66%)) had sought advice prior to attending the emergency department; 54% (77) of the 137 children who attended with an injury presented promptly to emergency (ie, within 4 h of injury) whereas of the 216 presenting with an illness, 41% (88) presented within 2–7 days of the onset of the illness.
Conclusions: This study displayed the accuracy of “parental triage,” that is, parents assess their child’s health and generally engage in appropriate care-giving and care-seeking behaviours before presenting to a paediatric emergency department. Highlighted are the deficiencies in current primary care services available to families and the perception that not all cases deemed as non-urgent by the emergency department are able to be dealt with in a primary care setting.
Footnotes
-
Funding The chief investigator was awarded a scholarship to undertake this study by the Royal Children’s Hospital Foundation, Brisbane.
-
Competing interests None.
-
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by the Royal Children’s Hospital, Ethics Committee and University of Queensland Ethics Committee.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.








