Article Text

Download PDFPDF
JournalWatch

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Autism: What’s in a name?

Failure to respond to name by age 12 months was a marker for autism in at-risk children.

Studies of early home videos of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have shown decreased “response-to-name” behavior during infancy. To examine the accuracy of this behavior as a marker for autism, researchers compared infants who had older siblings with ASD (at-risk group) and infants who did not have siblings with ASD (controls) and then followed the children prospectively for 2 years.

Responses to a standardized test of response to name (turning and making eye contact) were examined in at-risk infants and control infants at age 6 months and age 12 months. At age 24 months, 46 at-risk infants and 25 control infants with data from the 12-month assessment were evaluated for ASD and other developmental delays.

At 6 months, differences between groups were not significant, but, at 12 months, more control infants than at-risk infants responded to their names after fewer calls. Failure to respond to name at 12 months had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 89% for identifying a child with ASD and a sensitivity of 39% and a specificity of 94% for identifying a child with any developmental delay, including ASD. Results of other analyses suggested that response-to-name behavior is a stronger measure of social interaction than of receptive language.

Comment ▸

This study presents an interesting assessment of a simple screening test for children aged …

View Full Text