rss
Arch Dis Child 2006;91:977-980 doi:10.1136/adc.2006.096073
  • Original article

Perceptions of parents on the participation of their infants in clinical research

  1. A Gammelgaard1,
  2. L E Knudsen2,
  3. H Bisgaard3
  1. 1Department of Medical Philosophy and Clinical Theory, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Environmental Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. 3Danish Paediatric Asthma Centre, Department of Paediatrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to:
    A Gammelgaard
    Department of Medical Philosophy and Clinical Theory, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark;a.gammelgaard{at}medphil.ku.dk
  • Accepted 28 June 2006
  • Published Online First 4 July 2006

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the motivations and perceptions of parents on the participation of their infants and young children in a comprehensive and invasive clinical research study.

Methods: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 23 mothers with asthma whose infants and young children were participating in the Copenhagen Prospective Study on Asthma in Childhood. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using the template analysis method.

Results: Parents were motivated by altruism and by the opportunity to get their child checked regularly by medical experts to prevent the possible development of asthma. Parents found it very important that their children enjoyed their visits to the research clinic, and that they could withdraw from the study if their child started responding negatively to those visits. No apparent difference was seen in the attitude between the parents of children with lung or skin symptoms and those of healthy children.

Conclusions: It is possible to design and accomplish invasive clinical research on infants and young children in a manner that parents find ethically sound.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 4 July 2006

  • Funding: This study was supported by the Danish Pediatric Asthma Centre, the Research Centre for Environmental Health (ISMF) contract no 0-302-02-3/7, the CHILDRENGENONETWORK (QLK4-CT-2002-02198), Aase & Ejnar Danielsens Fund and the Lippmann Fund. The funders had no involvement in this work.

  • Competing interests: None declared.

Responses to this article

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics