Article Text

PDF

Should a neonate with possible late onset infection always have a lumbar puncture?
  1. K Malbon,
  2. R Mohan,
  3. R Nicholl
  1. Neonatal Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow HA1 3UJ, UK; richard.nicholl{at}nwlh.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

A baby born at 28 weeks gestation initially has no respiratory disease and is breathing spontaneously in room air. On day 6 of life the baby develops increasingly frequent and severe apnoeas and episodes of bradycardia that are mostly self-limiting. In view of this, nasal continuous positive airway pressure is started, a blood culture taken, and broad spectrum antibiotics commenced. On the ward round the next morning there is a debate as to whether a lumbar puncture (LP) should also have been performed, as part of the investigations for bacterial infection. The registrar opines that this was considered, but that the baby was thought “too unstable” for the procedure.

If an LP is performed routinely as part of the investigations for infection, how often will it be informative?

Structured clinical question

In neonates [patient] what is the incidence of meningitis [outcome] in late onset infection [greater than 48 hours]?

Search strategy

Secondary sources: Cochrane and Dare: no relevant results.

Primary sources: searched Medline, Pubmed, Embase and CINAHL databases via Dialog Datastar with the search criteria detailed in table 1.

Table 1

 Search criteria

Number of hits: 26, of which five were relevant clinical studies.

Reviews and non-English language papers were excluded.

See table 2.

Table 2

 Use of lumbar punctures in neonates with possible late onset infection

Commentary

Meningitis is an important complication of late onset neonatal infection. In the five studies cited, CSF culture was positive in 1.3–3.5% of babies with suspected infection. These studies covered the period 1980 to 2004, during which time the incidence of meningitis does not seem to have changed. There appear to be epidemiological differences, with a lower prevalence of late onset meningitis in neonates in the UK.1

This has implications for treatment, such as the increased length of therapy or the choice of antimicrobial agent, where agents with higher CSF penetration may need to be considered. The mortality and morbidity in late onset meningitis is higher than in early onset meningitis. Blood cultures may often be negative in these babies, causing antibiotics to be discontinued too soon.

The studies are in agreement that 15–30% of babies with meningitis (CSF culture positive) have negative blood cultures.2 Some of this may be due to the presence of viral or fungal infections, while others are due to meningitis without bacterial infection. This highlights the importance of routinely performing an LP in the investigation of late onset infection.

Except for the study by Visser and colleagues,3 LPs were not performed routinely for investigation of infection. They were more likely to be performed if the blood cultures were positive, and even then only 60% of such babies had LPs performed. Therefore, it is likely that there is an underestimation of the prevalence of meningitis. Visser et al found that nearly one third of septic babies had coexisting meningitis.3 Other studies, except for that of Kumar and colleagues,4 have not investigated this proportion, though all studies showed a similar overall incidence of meningitis.

Late onset meningitis is associated with a variety of organisms, though they are predominantly Gram negative. There is a higher incidence of viral and fungal (commonly Candida albicans) organisms than in early onset infection. Episodes of group B streptococcal infection can present late and are more likely to be associated with meningitis. All studies excluded diphtheroids and Staphylococcus epidermidis as being contaminants, unless they were grown in multiple cultures and there was a clinical indication of infection.

The low rates of LP in the studies are attributed to the perceived adverse effects of the procedures, where babies are considered “too sick to tap”. Complications that have been described in the literature include trauma, introduction of infection, spinal epidermoid tumours, brain stem herniation, and hypoxic stress for the baby. In the studies reviewed, none of the above complications were reported.4 In the study by Stoll and colleagues there was no difference in the risk of death between infants who did and did not have an LP.5 However, meningitis increased the risk of death substantially (23% mortality in babies with meningitis versus 9% in those who had an LP but no meningitis).

The study by Stoll and colleagues5 found that among patients who had an LP performed, there was no significant difference across centres in the rate of positive CSF cultures (confirmed in this review). This finding suggests that, although there are LP practice differences across centres, they probably are not explained by better clinical acumen. The study also found that 10 of 90 repeat LPs grew the same organism as the original CSF culture, emphasising the importance of a repeat LP to determine that meningitis has been appropriately treated.

Although the number of babies to investigate for possible bacterial infection in order to diagnose one case of meningitis may seem high, lumbar puncture in this population seems to be safe, the treatment (intravenous antibiotics) is effective, and the event (meningitis) and the implications of missing it are potentially very serious.

CLINICAL BOTTOM LINE

  • In neonates with late onset infection the prevalence of meningitis varies from 1.3% to 3.5% (depending on the patient population). (Grade B)

  • 30–90 babies (depending on the patient population) who are already being investigated for serious bacterial illness would need to have an LP to detect one baby with meningitis. (Grade A)

  • At least 15% of neonates with meningitis may have a negative blood culture. (Grade A)

  • Lumbar puncture should be considered as part of the routine investigation of late onset infection (after 48 hours) in neonates. (Grade B)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr Lydia Hristeva for kindly reanalysing the raw data from Oxford. We thank Dr Roslyn Thomas for asking the question in the first place.

REFERENCES

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Edited by Bob Phillips

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.