Article Text



Statistics from


J. E. C. Round. Graduate Entry Programme, St George’s Hospital Medical School, Tooting, London

Background: In 2000 SGHMS began teaching graduates in a new 4 year course, alongside its conventional integrated undergraduate 5 year programme. Over the first 2 years students used problem based learning (PBL) to cover aspects of basic science, clinical skills, communication, and fundamentals of clinical medicine. In 2003 the 35 students began a 5 week PBL based clinical paediatrics course. This report describes the programme and some outcome measures.

Methods: Rather than paper based problems, the course exposed students to real clinical situations that needed understanding and solving. Such exposure occurred in clinics, A&E, at homes, and on wards. Cases encountered were explored in two semi-formalised sessions a week with a tutor (a process we termed clinical PBL). Furthermore, one intranet based PBL case a week was used, to ensure the whole curriculum was covered. There were no lectures. Outcome was measured by an end of firm questionnaire and a summative assessment comparing results with the 5 year course. A questionnaire looked at career choices in the graduate group.

Results: Students enjoyed the course, awarding it 4.7 (0.1) out of 5 (arbitrary scale) compared with 4.2 (0.8) for the 5 year course (p 0.05). Students felt similarly competent in history and examination skills in both courses. In the end of firm (summative) assessment, students scored 64.1 (1.7) % compared with the traditional course mean of 56.1 (1.4) % (p<0.005). A large number intended to choose paediatrics as a career, with 20% expressing paediatrics as their first choice of career and 51% suggesting it as a possible choice.

Conclusions: Paediatrics can be taught as a problem based curriculum and appears good at teaching practical paediatrics, skills, and interesting students in the specialty. The tutorial based nature of the teaching has staffing implications.


M. Stewart, S. Morison. Department of Child Health, The Queen’s University of Belfast & Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children

Learning from Bristol recommends that medical education and training should pay more attention to non-clinical aspects of care including the development of skills in communicating with patients and colleagues, and teamwork, and these should be formally assessed.

Aim: To design, deliver, and assess ward based inter-professional learning of clinical, teamwork, and communication skills for undergraduate students in paediatrics and children’s nursing. By involving SHOs as well as specialist medical and nursing educators in delivery, assessment, and feedback, the programme aimed to satisfy not only undergraduate GMC and NMC learning outcomes but also the relevant training requirements of SHOs.

Method: The programme was designed and delivered during the 2002/3 academic year and involved 31 students, six SHOs, and four educators. Assessment included objective measures of skills and knowledge, quantitative evaluation of communication and team working skills, and structured feedback on the educational value of the exercise. The programme was evaluated using a combination of quantitative methods deemed most appropriate for healthcare education research.

Results: Most students scored highly (OSCE) in their ability to perform the required clinical skill with no difference between medical and nursing students. Students identified as not participating in teaching provided by nurse specialists scored less well. Clinical knowledge was included in the end of course assessment. Communication and team working skills were marked separately by a minimum of three assessors, using a standardised marking scheme, and the marks amalgamated into a single combined percentage. Scores ranged from 53–82%. Again, medical and nursing student scores were similar.

Conclusions: Student evaluation of the project was positive for all learning outcomes and for the assessment process but they asked that marks should count towards final assessment. SHOs indicated that their involvement had helped them to learn to teach, learn more about teaching methods, work with other healthcare professionals, and communication skills particularly regarding “explaining” to parents.


S. Frazer1, M. Rudolf2, D. Owens3. 1United Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust; 2East Leeds PCT, University of Leeds; 3University of Leeds

Background: One of the greatest challenges facing higher specialty training is ensuring adequate structured teaching for SpRs in the light of the new European working time directives.

Aims: To design, implement, and evaluate distance access learning materials to support structured teaching for SpRs with only limited resources.

Methods: A pilot was undertaken for the 5 day Growth and Nutrition module on the MMedSc in Child Health at Leeds. Each educational session was duplicated either as an interactive web based tutorial or recorded lecture delivered on CD-ROM. Students’ reactions where recorded by interview on the last day of the module and by completion of an evaluation form as well as individual online evaluation forms for each session.

Results: 17 SpRs participated in the detailed evaluation and interview. 64 evaluation forms were electronically submitted for individual electronic tutorials. Of the 17 SpRs surveyed in detail, all had accessed the DALEs material. In addition to 8 who were unable to attend the study day, 6 had done so prior to a study day, 7 after attending the study day to clarify some aspect of the teaching, and 13 after attending the study day to reinforce the learning. Of the 64 online evaluation forms 34 (53%) rated the tutorials as excellent, 16 (25%) very good, and 14 (22%) good. 43 (67%) agreed and 21 (33%) strongly agreed that they had a greater knowledge and understanding of the subject following the online tutorial. Trainees valued the opportunity to access material to reinforce learning as well as the ability to catch up on missed sessions. The strengths of the material were the use of interactive questions with hidden answers.

Conclusions: Computer assisted learning can not only support structured education programmes but can also enhance the trainees learning experience. As technology and expertise improve computer assisted learning is facilitating exciting and innovative ways of delivering postgraduate medical training, and can mitigate the problems anticipated as a result of European working directives.


N. Fowler, A. Isaacs, M. E. Blair. Department of Paediatrics, Imperial College, London, Northwick Park Hospital Campus

Background: Many studies have assessed the impact of clinical teaching on adult patients. We found no similar study in children. In the context of increasing numbers of students and teaching governance, children’s views need to be sought on how “bedside” teaching is experienced.

Aim: To determine the attitudes of children and their parents to the process of medical student teaching in the clinical setting.

Method: A semi-quantitive questionnaire was designed to elicit clients’ attitudes toward teaching as experienced within the acute setting. Administration to parents and children after a teaching session in which the teachers were partially blinded.

Results: 51 out of 60 (85%) questionnaires completed. 27 within an ambulatory care setting, 24 within the inpatient unit. Age range: 6 days to 15 years (mean 4.2 years). 31% rated it “excellent”, 58% “good”, and 11% “satisfactory”. 78% of families questioned felt they had gained from the teaching in some way; the most common feelings expressed were those of helping students learn and of learning more about the child’s illness. Despite a unit policy of no white coats, many families described students’ attire (in particular, ties) as a barrier to easy communication. Soft toys and bubbles carried by students were identified as important in helping small children feel more comfortable. The presence of two students was rated by parents and children as optimal. A rating of excellent was inversely correlated to the number of students present in the encounter. Younger patients felt comfortable with fewer students; adolescents felt up to five students were acceptable.

Conclusion: Acutely ill children and their accompanying carers generally enjoy the experience and the opportunity to support student learning. Teachers should be sensitive to the needs of younger children in relation to the numbers of students attending. Students should be encouraged to carry soft and other small toys and dress “casual smart”.


A. Reece, A. G. Sutcliffe. The Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH

Introduction: Research has been published with pre-registration house officers (PRHO) involving traditional posts of medicine, surgery, and emerging posts in general practice. No study of paediatric posts has been published.

Aim: To perform a qualitative evaluation by questionnaire survey of paediatric PRHO posts in the UK.

Methods: Doctors employed in paediatric PRHO posts across all UK deaneries enrolled between August 2002 and April 2003. Consent to approach doctors was obtained from postgraduate deans. Multicentre research ethics approval was granted.

Results: There were 61 paediatric PRHO posts in 16 of the 18 deaneries; the majority were 4 month posts. 124 questionnaires were distributed and 64 (51.6%) were returned complete. Over 50% of respondents were planning or considering a career in paediatrics. Over 90% of respondents are exposed to core clinical skills (history taking, examining, and prescribing medications for children). A small number reported regularly performing specialist procedures; for example abdominal paracentesis, treating pneumothorax, and tapping pleural effusion. Common paediatric conditions were seen regularly by most respondents. Some doctors are performing inappropriate clinical duties as defined by the GMC. Doctors suggested good points and things they would like to change about the post. Over 90% rated the paediatric post as having a strong or very strong influence on their desire to continue in paediatrics.

Conclusions: Paediatric PRHO posts offer good experience of paediatrics to newly qualified doctors, and the opportunity to develop core skills. The GMC might wish to update advice in The new doctor to include paediatric posts and, similarly, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health should describe objectives for PRHOs. This research is particularly pertinent in view of plans for the new “foundation” house officer years.


R. J. Tozer1, S. C. W. Rowland2. 1Institute of Child Health, University College London/Barking, Havering and Redbridge NHS Trust; 2Department of Education and Professional Development, University College London

Aims: Current changes in working practices will affect learning opportunities for junior doctors. We explored SHOs’ opinions about teaching, supervision and feedback, facilitating independence, goals and standards, learning facilities, and workload on their units to enable us to make suggestions to optimise learning.

Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 90 SHOs on 15 neonatal units in north east and north central London, Essex, and Hertfordshire between November 2002 and February 2003. 46 replies were received, a response rate of 51%.

Results: Educational facilities such as internet linked computers and textbooks are generally available. 51% of SHOs say that their units provide ⩽2 h per week of protected teaching. Due to shift work and service commitments 42% of SHOs attend less than half of formal teaching sessions provided, failing to satisfy Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health guidelines. 44% of SHOs stated that excessive workload affects their learning and 27% had difficulty obtaining study leave. SHOs found teaching ward rounds and small group sessions helpful in promoting a deeper understanding of neonatal medicine. There were complaints that lectures, which accounted for the majority of teaching, were uninteresting and not clinically relevant enough. Many wrote about being valued as members of the team, supported, and encouraged to learn by senior doctors; however, a significant number felt humiliated when they received what they felt to be unjustified or excessive criticism. Only 16% received feedback after on calls or night shifts. Half of respondents felt that feedback was given in a positive way with value given to their own opinions, helping them to improve their performance. 47% of SHOs said that did not have control over how they learnt.

Conclusions: Replacing lecture style teaching with more patient orientated sessions will make better use of available working hours and improve SHOs satisfaction with their training. Investment in medical education training is needed to equip doctors with the confidence and ability to support the learning of junior colleagues, develop skills which enable lifelong learning, and meet the needs of patients.


A. Freeburn, R. Tubman, S. Craig. Regional Neonatal Unit, Royal Jubilee Maternity Service, Belfast BT12 6BB

Background: Implementation of the European Working Time Directive is leading to decreased number of hours worked by junior medical staff, by the increased use of full or partial shift rotas. There are concerns that this will have a detrimental impact on training particularly, at the SHO grade. The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health has recently decreased the educational attendance standard from 75% to 70%, aiming for 2 h per week, but emphasising the priority of quality of teaching.1 The aim of this study was to quantify attendance at the twice weekly formal teaching sessions by SHOs working on an eight person full shift rota.

Method: The setting was a tertiary neonatal unit. An attendance register was completed at each hour long teaching session after SHOs changed from an on call to a full shift rota.

Results: The median (range) attendance was 53.0 (35.6–71.4) %. Only one SHO achieved >70% attendance. By comparison, attendance by registrars, working on a “1 in 5 on call” rota, was 66.7 (46.4–71.4) %. Only one registrar achieved >70% attendance. The most frequent reason for non-attendance was off duty, followed by annual leave and study leave. 13.6% of the sessions were disrupted by clinical work despite a bleep free policy.

Conclusion: These results suggest that 70% attendance is unattainable for SHOs on a full shift rota. It may be possible to improve attendance by better planning of clinical duties. Adoption of a more holistic approach to education2 may be necessary to improve quality of SHO training since attendance at formal teaching sessions is limited by shift working patterns.




M. G. Gnanalingham, C. M. John, D. E. Mathew, N. V. Subhedar. Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool L12 2AP

Introduction: Clinical audit has a pivotal role in health education, as we seek to continuously improve the quality of patient care. Completion of the audit cycle establishes the effectiveness of the audit in improving patient healthcare.

Objective: To ascertain how many audits fulfilled the full audit criteria and how many closed the loop by re-auditing. The standard set was 100% of audits should fulfill the full audit criteria and have been re-audited.

Methods: 134 registered audits undertaken between 1994 and 2000 at a children’s teaching hospital were examined retrospectively. The audit cycle was categorised into 6 stages and the different levels of audit defined as full, partial, potential, and planning.1

Results: Out of 134 audits, 8 (6%) were excluded, as they were research projects. Of the remaining 126 audits, 35 (28%) were full, 53 (42%) were partial, 30 (24%) were potential, and 7 (6%) were planning audits. Of the various specialties, paediatric (34, 27%) and community (20, 16%) medicine undertook the most, and the allied disciplines of audiology, nutrition, physiotherapy, and nursing undertook the least 8 (6%) audits. Re-audits were undertaken in 25 (20%) audits. Recommendations were made in 77 (61%) audits.

Conclusions: Most audits undertaken do not fulfill the full audit criteria and have not been re-audited. There is marked variation in audit practice within the various paediatric specialties.

Recommendations: Newcomers to audit are given training on audit methodology. A definite time frame for re-auditing should be decided when an audit is first undertaken. All audit departments should undertake an audit of their audits on an annual basis. These measures should promote awareness and lead to better quality audits.



A. K. Smith1, C. P. J. Charlton2. 1School of Nursing, Nottingham University; 2Paediatric Gastroenterology, QMC, University Hospital, Nottingham

Aim: To administer parentral nutrition at home, parents need expert skills. We wanted to find out retrospectively what were the issues that mattered to parents when learning to administer HPN?

Method: All parents who had experienced learning HPN (1987–1999) were approached. Quantitative data collected included, total time in hospital on PN before teaching commenced (BT-PN), learning time in hospital (L-PN), and total time on HPN (T-HPN). Records were examined for evidence of teaching, learning, and consent. Semi-structured interviews with parents were qualitatively analysed.

Results: Nine out of nine parents of children, all with short bowl syndrome, agreed to be interviewed. At the time of the study four had completed treatment, three were currently on HPN, and two children had died. Data fell into two groups; six early pioneer cases with no teaching protocol or record in the notes of teaching, mean BT-PN 99 days and L-PN 58 days and 3 later protocol led cases, mean BT-PN 7 days and L-PN 18 days where records did not confirm competence. T-HPN ranged from 3 months to an ongoing 7 years. The teaching documentation referred only to inpatient education. None had written consent. Parents reported learning difficulties; their changing emotional state, different teachers, various techniques, different equipment, and no teaching at home. Ultimately they felt unacknowledged experts but vulnerable and wanted refreshing and revalidation of skills. When hypothetically offered the ideal of a 24 h HPN nurse all stated that the benefit of parent administration was providing control over the illness and maintaining family privacy.

Conclusion: Parents have less time to observe and learn PN in hospital and for nurses to identify specific difficulties to their learning. Continuing learning at home has not been acknowledged. Further, documentation did not capture the parents’ progression in learning and competence; this in conjunction with the lack of formal consent may compromise legal accountability.


J. E. McDonagh, T. R. Southwood, K. L. Shaw, the British Paediatric Rheumatology Group. Institute of Child Health, Division of Reproductive and Child Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

Background: Transitional care has been highlighted as a main subject area in future curricula in adolescent health by the RCPCH (2003) and is an important aspect of management of adolescents with chronic illnesses like juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The aim of this study was to determine the perceived education and training needs of health professionals currently involved in the care of adolescents with JIA prior to the implementation of a national transitional care programme.

Methods: Two distinct questionnaires to identify adolescent health and transitional care issues in JIA were distributed to key health professionals involved in the care of adolescents with JIA (n = 908) and to clinical research personnel appointed to coordinate the implementation of a transitional care programme at a local level in 10 UK centres (n = 22).

Results: 263 professionals completed the first survey (29%). Education and training needs were reported by 114 (43%) health professionals. Transition issues (23% completion) and informational resources (21%) were the most frequently reported areas of need. 22 clinical research personnel completed the second survey (100% completion), who rated lack of training, lack of teaching materials geared towards adolescents, and limited clinic time as the main barriers to providing developmentally appropriate care to adolescents. Specific adolescent conditions/concerns were all perceived as of moderate to high importance to address in the rheumatology clinic by the majority of respondents. Over half of clinical research personnel reported low/very low perceived skills/comfort levels in addressing sexual health issues (54%). Over a third of research personnel reported a lack of confidence in addressing fertility issues (59%), facilitating peer support (36%), dealing with benefits (36%), and available community agencies and services for adolescents (32%).

Conclusion: Unmet education and training needs of healthcare professionals exist in key areas of transitional care and provide a useful guide for the development of future multidisciplinary training programmes.


M. I. Levene1, R. Olver2. 1Academic Unit of Paediatrics, University of Leeds; 2Academic Unit of Paediatrics, University of Dundee

There is evidence of high esteem in UK university departments of paediatrics, but recent changes in funding council support to universities influenced by the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) may be causing an erosion of staffing levels with the prospect of reducing career advancement in academic paediatrics.

Aims: To assess changes in staffing and confidence in academic departments teaching undergraduate paediatrics in the UK.

Methods: A questionnaire was sent in April 2003 to all 23 academic departments in UK medical schools asking about changes in staffing levels in the previous 5 years, the effects of the RAE on research, and recent changes within their department.

Results: Complete responses were received from all 23 departments (100%). There were (FTE) 80 professors, 115.8 readers and senior lecturers, and 53 lecturers. In the previous 5 years there had been an overall reduction of 26.85 FTE posts (10%). This reduction was most marked at lecturer grade (25% loss). In the previous 2 years 10 (43%) departments had been required to change their title and in only two could paediatrics still be identified. In 12 of 23 (52%) centres the respondent stated that the most recent RAE had been detrimental or severely detrimental to their department.

Conclusions: There has been a recent significant loss of training posts in academic paediatrics as well as evidence of reduced morale. This may have major effects on all those who practice paediatrics in the UK in years to come.


F. Ali, C. P. J. Charlton. Paediatric Gastroenterology, University, Hospital, Nottingham

Aim: All doctors will be sending copies of GPs’ letters to patients by April 2004.1,2 We found no studies on families’ experience of reading letters and noted doctors’ concerns of increased workload and possible adverse outcomes. Therefore, we investigated families’ experience of receiving letters from a clinic where this has been the practice for the past 10 years.

Methods: FA interviewed, with a semi-structured questionnaire, 50 consecutive follow up attendees and 5 randomly selected from the non-attendees.

Results: All families agreed to be interviewed on the last letter from clinic. 92% stated they received the letter and 91% of these filed it, for further use. All letters were read by the main carer and 52% by the patient. There were no adverse outcomes, one correction requested relating to child protection and a small number of errors of name and address. The families rated highly their understanding of the letters and wanted copies to continue for the record of illness, clarification of plans, and record of medication. In one fifth of the sample, the medication was corrected upon receipt of the letter. 69% of children over 11 years interviewed read the letter and also valued it highly. Families preferred to receive the GP copy and accepted medical terminology knowing they could ask for clarification.

Conclusions: Parents and children studied benefit from receiving a copy of the clinic letter and in one fifth medication was altered only on receipt of the letter.




G. Minnaar1, K. Shaw2, J. E. McDonagh2. 1Diana, Princess of Wales Children’s Hospital, Birmingham; 2Institute of Child Health, University of Birmingham, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH

Background: Formal clinical training opportunities in adolescent health in the UK outside mental health are limited and there is a need for further research in this area. The RCPCH has recognised this need in the recommendations Bridging the gaps: health care for adolescents.

Objectives: To determine the perceived education and training needs in adolescent health of paediatric specialist registrars.

Methods: A modified version of the Perceptions of adolescent issues and resources: care of adolescents questionnaire1 was distributed to paediatric specialist registrars prior to an adolescent health study day. The results were analysed according to registrar year and the areas that scored very low/low were looked at in more detail.

Results: The survey was completed by 26 SpRs, 80% female. 85% of adolescent issues, including sexual and psychological health, were perceived to be of high/very high importance by at least 50% of SpRs. 50% of SpRs rated their knowledge to be low/very low in 29% of the subject areas recommended for training by the RCPCH. Very low/low perceived skill level and knowledge of resources were reported in addressing many issues of adolescent health, including dating and vulnerability (>55%) and sexuality (>80%). Lack of training was the main barrier to providing developmentally appropriate care to adolescents.

Conclusion: The education and training needs in adolescent health of paediatric specialist registrars is not currently being met, as suspected. The problems identified can now provide a useful guide for the development of future training programmes.

Abstract G76



C. Y. Vandevelde, C. P. J. Charlton. Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology; Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham

Introduction: Manufacturers are required to include a drug information insert with their medicines. The leaflet will include the indications for use and the patients’ age range, approved by the Medicines Control Agency when the company applied for a licence. A recent study showed that 36% of children during their inpatient admission received a medicine that was either unlicensed or off-label. The Royal College Committee on Medicines sent a letter to the chief executives, distributing information leaflets for parents and older children. This was to explain licensing and reassure parents and children that their unlicensed drugs are safe and appropriate despite the drug information insert.

Method: Two head teachers of Nottingham and Liverpool comprehensive schools agreed to present the leaflet as a class activity, to two classes of mixed ability. The children were given adequate time to answer a questionnaire, with the leaflet still at hand. They were judged to have understood the leaflet if they indicated: 1) not all medicines have licences; and 2) unlicensed drugs are safe to take if prescribed by your doctor. 50 children took part, the response rate was 100%. The authors evaluated the anonymous questionnaires.

Results: Six out of 50 children understood the leaflet. Sample comments included: “what is it trying to say?”, “be careful with unlicensed medicines”, and “are they (unlicensed medicines) dangerous?”. Fourteen commented it was interesting; 12 said it was difficult to understand.

Conclusion: The children failed to understand the key message, that unlicensed medicines are safe to take if prescribed by your doctor. This could lead to problems with compliance. The RCPCH needs to review policy on patient leaflets and ask children and young people to read them before production.


I. J. Ramage, T. J. Beattie. Yorkhill NHS Trust, Glasgow, G3 8SJ; West of Scotland Deanery

The study aim was to determine the qualifications and experience of trainee paediatricians at entry to specialist registrar (SpR) training. All 35 trainees appointed to the West of Scotland Deanery between 1996 and 2003 were contacted and requested to reply to a structured questionnaire. Information requested included university and year of graduation, undergraduate awards, sex, age at appointment, date of MRCPCH, and additional postgraduate qualifications. Previous employment data were obtained, including intra-deanery experience, junior (JHO) and senior house officer (SHO) experience in paediatrics and neonatology in both district general and teaching hospital posts in addition to non-paediatric experience and overseas work. Prior applications were noted in addition to publications and presentations. Of the 34 responses, 25 (75%) were female, with a median age of 29 years (min 27, max 39 years). Undergraduate education was in Scotland in 29/34 (85%). Eight (23%) had been awarded a BSc. Paediatric surgery experience was attained in 13/34 (38%). The median time between graduation and SpR appointment was 7 years (4, 16) and 2 years (0, 9) between MRCPCH and appointment. Median time as an SHO was 15.5 months (6, 30) in general paediatrics and 6 months (3, 13) in neonatology before progression to a supervisory SHO role for a median of 22 months (6, 54) in general paediatrics and 12 months (0, 41) in neonatology. Overseas training was undertaken by 21/34 (62%). A research period was undertaken by 5/34 (15%) with non-paediatric experience seen in 14/34 (41%). Intradeanery experience was present in 29/34 (85%) and 7/34 (21%) had been interviewed for this deanery previously, with a further 10/34 (29%) having failed elsewhere. The median number of publications at appointment was 0 (0, 16), with few presentations, median 1 (0,22). No difference was observed in any variable between those appointed in 1996 and 2003.

In summary this study fails to demonstrate a decline in duration of training prior to SpR appointment. It also demonstrates a paucity of interest in obtaining publications prior to interview. With national competition for subspecialty appointments now in place concerns exist that SpRs from this deanery may not be competitive on a national basis.


H. M. Sammons, J. McIntyre, I. Choonara. Academic Division of Child Health, University of Nottingham, Derbyshire Children’s Hospital

Introduction: Paediatric specialist registrars (SpRs) are the consultants of the future and it will be their responsibility to take forward research in children, initiating their own research, and supervising that of juniors under their training.

Aims: To assess the current research activity of paediatric SpRs, their attitudes and motivations in this field, and training in research methods given.

Method: A questionnaire based study carried out in the training regions of Mid Trent, North Trent, South Trent, Northern, and the West Midlands.

Results: A total of 280 questionnaires were sent out and 100 returned (36% response rate). The results will be quoted as a percentage of the 100 respondents. The year of graduation was 1986–2000 (mean 1995) with 70% female. 38% of the whole group published papers (53% of year 5 or greater SpRs), the number of papers rising with SpR year (χ2 = 13.5, df = 1, p <0.001). Only 43% of the group had carried out research in an SpR post with only 15% feeling that they had protected time for research. 15% had held a research post (duration 5–42 months) and 17% held or were studying for a higher degree (MD 10%, 3.5% PhD, and 3.5% MSc). Less than half the group felt they had the skills to secure funding, write a protocol, submit to ethics, or statistically analyse data or present it. 53% of trainees had not received any time designated to research skills within SpR training days. The format of teaching was how to read papers (45%), evidence-based medicine (31%), and statistics (22%). Only 17% felt that there was enough training in research and a third felt there should be a mandatory period within training. Motivation was high, 49% looking forward to research, 18% describing it as a necessary evil. Their most important motivators were CV (37%), answering questions (35%), and interest in the subject (28%). 68% expressed an interest to undertake future research.

Conclusion: Paediatric SpRs have a strong motivation to do research but many may not have the skills, training, or opportunity to do this within their Calman training post. We need to promote research and its training within the SpR grade.

View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.