rss
Arch Dis Child 2003;88:737-739 doi:10.1136/adc.88.8.737
  • Child health series

Children with autistic spectrum disorders. II: Parents are unable to distinguish secretin from placebo under double-blind conditions

  1. J Coplan1,
  2. M C Souders1,
  3. A E Mulberg5,
  4. J K Belchic1,
  5. J Wray2,
  6. A F Jawad3,
  7. P R Gallagher3,
  8. R Mitchell1,
  9. M Gerdes4,
  10. S E Levy1
  1. 1Division of Child Development and Rehabilitation, Children’s Seashore House of The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  2. 2State Child Development Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital, West Perth, Australia
  3. 3Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
  4. 4Division of General Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
  5. 5Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr S E Levy, Division of Child Development and Rehabilitation, Children’s Seashore House of The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3405 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;
    levys{at}email.chop.edu
  • Accepted 27 October 2002

Abstract

Background: Standardised measures of behaviour have failed to detect short term improvement in children with autism following treatment with secretin. However, it is possible that standardised measures are insensitive to dimensions of child behaviour that are nonetheless detectable by parents.

Aim: To determine the ability of parents of children with autism to guess, under double blind conditions, whether their child had received secretin or placebo.

Methods: 2×2 crossover randomised blinded study, comparing the effect of synthetic human secretin 2 U/kg to placebo (saline). Sixty two children with autism (aged 43–103 months) were randomly allocated to two groups: group 1 received placebo, followed six weeks later by secretin, and group 2 received secretin followed by placebo. At the conclusion of the study, parents were asked to guess their child’s group assignment.

Results: Twenty seven families guessed their child’s group assignment correctly and 27 guessed incorrectly. In 48 instances, parents based their guess on perceived improvement; in six cases, parents based their guess on perceived deterioration. Six families saw no difference after either infusion, and offered no guess. One family dropped out after the first infusion, and one family was lost to follow up after the second infusion.

Conclusion: In a controlled setting, parents of young children with autism are unable to distinguish the short term behavioural effects of secretin from placebo.

Footnotes

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics