Article Text

Download PDFPDF
How good is clinical examination at detecting a significant patent ductus arteriosus in the preterm neonate?
  1. D S Urquhart1,
  2. R M Nicholl2
  1. 1Specialist Registrar in Paediatrics, Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, UK
  2. 2Consultant Neonatologist, Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, UK

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

A 25 week gestation infant aged 30 days has a continuous murmur and easily palpable pulses. He has already received a course of indomethacin for a “clinically diagnosed” patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The baby is ventilator dependent. How good (or bad) is clinical examination at diagnosing a clinically important PDA?

Structured clinical question

In a ventilator dependent neonate of very low birth weight (<1000 g) [patient], how good is clinical examination [intervention] at detecting patent ductus arteriosus [outcome]?

Search strategy and outcome

A search string of [patent arterial duct] AND [diagnostic test] was used.

Search results

PubMed—three papers.

Cochrane database—nil.

SUMSearch—nil other than PubMed articles.

Search done independently by DU and RN retrieved same three articles. See table 3 …

View Full Text