OBJECTIVES Male reproductive health has deteriorated in recent decades. It is proposed that increased testicular temperature in early childhood, due to the use of modern disposable plastic lined nappies (diapers), could be an important factor contributing to this decline.
STUDY DESIGN Scrotal skin temperature was measured non-invasively in 48 healthy children aged 0–55 months (three age groups) for two 24 hour periods in randomised order (either cotton or disposable plastic lined nappies) using a portable, miniature recorder.
RESULTS Mean 24 hour scrotal temperature (2880 measurements) was significantly higher in all age groups during the periods of plastic nappy use than with cotton nappies (p < 0.001). The rectoscrotal temperature difference was significantly higher with cotton than with plastic nappy use (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS Scrotal hypothermia is an important factor for normal spermatogenesis. This study shows that scrotal temperature, which closely reflects testicular temperature, is increased in boys wearing disposable plastic lined nappies. The physiological testicular cooling mechanism is blunted and often completely abolished during plastic nappy use. The present results establish the basis for further research on the impact of increased testicular temperature in infancy on later spermatogenesis.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
It has been suggested that male reproductive health has deteriorated during the last two to three decades.1 First, the incidence of testicular cancer has increased in several countries.2-6 Furthermore, several studies have shown that the quality of human semen has declined.7-11 To date, the causes for these trends remain unclear, although several factors have been implicated as reasons for male reproductive problems. Among these are environmental factors—for example, xenoestrogens, chemical hormone disruptors, changes in lifestyle (tight fitting underwear, more sedentary activities), and exposure to heat (sauna, occupational). Until now, the effect of increased testicular temperature has been investigated mainly in adults with respect to type of underwear,12 occupational heat exposure,13 14 sauna bath,15 and artificial cryptorchidism as a means of male contraception.16 17 We propose a new hypothesis: exposure to increased testicular temperature for prolonged duration during early childhood as a result of the use of modern disposable plastic lined nappies could be an important factor in the decline in semen quality and the increasing incidence of testicular cancer in adult age. The obvious first step in investigating this hypothesis would be to characterise the temperature milieu in disposable nappies compared with that in traditional cotton nappies. We therefore prospectively studied 48 healthy, male, nappy wearing children by closely monitoring scrotal skin temperature for 24 hours using modern non-invasive thermoprobes.
Probands and methods
Three groups of healthy male children were studied. Group I, 14 term and preterm neonates aged 0–4 weeks (five preterms with gestational age 28–36 weeks were studied between postnatal age 14 and 85 days); group II, 22 infants aged 1–12 months; and group III, 12 toddlers aged 13–55 months. After obtaining informed written consent from the parents or guardians, probands were studied prospectively over two 24 hour periods. The study was approved by the ethics committees of the Medical Faculty of the University of Kiel.
Scrotal skin temperature was recorded using the miniaturised portable digital data recorder Thermoport (Armin Gräwe Funkelektronik, Münster, Germany). The Thermoport device measures 11 × 7 × 3.3 cm. Two temperature probes (YSI, Model 409BD, Yellow Springs Instrument Co Inc, Yellow Springs, Ohio, USA) with a diameter of 9 mm were connected to the recording device. The frequency of temperature readings was set to once every 30 seconds, resulting in 2880 readings per 24 hours. Data were stored in the Thermoport, then downloaded and transferred to statistics and graphics programs.
The accuracy of the temperature measurements was assessed and officially certified by the German Bureau of Standards. It was shown to be 0.09°C (SD 0.054°C) over a temperature range of 29.89 to 43.01°C (n = 28).
The subjects were studied for two 24 hour periods in randomised order: one period using cotton nappies and the other using modern disposable plastic lined nappies (Pampers, Procter & Gamble, Schwalbach, Germany). The temperature probes were attached to the scrotal skin at the lateral and caudal pole of the testis with thin transparent tape (Tegaderm, 3M Health Care, Borken, Germany). The tape caused no discomfort and did not inhibit free movement. An activity protocol, including all manipulations with the nappies in sleep and awake periods, was filled out by the mothers. The number of nappy changes was calculated for each 24 hour period. Typical 24 hour temperature profiles during either cotton or plastic nappy use are shown in fig 1. Rectal temperature was determined between 0800 and 1200 in each 24 hour period using a calibrated digital thermometer. Temperature measurements were performed within one year excluding the hot summer months (July and August).
The data were used to calculate the mean 24 hour temperature for right and left scrotal sides separately, the mean temperature during activity (waking) and sleep periods, the difference between rectal and mean scrotal temperature, and to define the maximal temperature during each of the profiles. Statistical analysis was performed using Sigmastat 2.0 (SPSS, Erkrath, Germany). Significance between two paired samples was assessed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test and, where appropriate, by the paired t test. Statistical comparisons between the three age groups were done by one way analysis of variance. The Student-Newman-Keuls test was used as posthoc test. The frequency of high (⩾ 37°C) v lower (< 37°C) maximal temperatures within the groups was assessed by Fisher's test of exact probability. p < 0.05 Was considered significant. Data are given as mean SD.
Mean 24 hour scrotal skin temperature showed significant differences in the periods when cotton nappies were worn compared with those when plastic lined disposable nappies were used (fig 1). Left scrotal skin temperature is shown in table 1. The data of the right side were very similar (NS v left side, data not shown). In all three study groups, scrotal temperature was consistently and significantly higher during the use of modern disposable nappies compared with cotton nappies. This was seen for both the right and the left side (table 1). The mean difference in scrotal temperature between the two ranged between 0.6 and 1.1°C in the three groups. The highest mean temperatures were seen in the youngest boys wearing plastic nappies. In general, group I showed the highest, and group III the lowest mean scrotal temperatures (table 1). There was no significant difference between right and left mean scrotal temperatures in any age group.
When analysed separately for daytime (wake) and sleep periods, scrotal skin temperature was significantly higher in group II and group III for both periods when disposable nappies were used (table 1; no separate analysis of wake and sleep periods in group I). There was no difference between the two 24 hour periods in the number of nappy changes. Thus, a higher frequency of nappy changes in the periods with cotton nappy use could not be responsible for lower mean 24 hour temperatures during periods of cotton nappy use.
The maximal scrotal skin temperatures recorded over 24 hours were equal or above 37°C in 5, 3, and 0 children using cotton nappiesv 11, 12, and 7 boys using plastic nappies in groups I, II, and III, respectively (p < 0.01 for groups II and III). Mean maximal temperatures within one group were equal or above 37°C in all three groups during the periods of plastic nappy use, but were below 37°C during the cotton nappy periods. This difference was significant (p < 0.001 for all groups, table 1).
Rectal temperature was comparable between the two 24 hour periods of the study in all three study groups. When rectal core temperature was simultaneously recorded, the difference between rectal and mean scrotal temperature was consistently and significantly lower (p < 0.01 to p < 0.001) during plastic nappy use than during cotton nappy use (table 1). Thus, the physiological testicular cooling mechanism was markedly blunted by the insulation properties of modern plastic lined nappies. In four boys, mean 24 hour scrotal skin temperature was similar to rectal temperature during the plastic nappy periods. Taking into consideration the measuring error of 0.2°C for the rectal and 0.1°C for the scrotal temperature measurements, a total of 13 boys did not show any significant rectoscrotal temperature difference during the plastic nappy periods. This was not seen in any subject during the cotton nappy periods. In general, rectoscrotal temperature differences were lowest in the youngest boys and highest in the oldest boys, varying between means of 1.5–2.5°C in the cotton, and 0.5–1.6°C in the plastic nappy periods.
The clinical observation of very high scrotal temperatures in feverish baby boys wearing modern disposable plastic lined nappies prompted us to investigate this phenomenon systematically. In the present study, we have shown that scrotal skin temperature is significantly increased in healthy young boys wearing plastic lined nappies compared with traditional cotton nappies. Scrotal skin temperature has been shown to reflect testicular temperature reasonably well.18-20 In the present study we monitored scrotal skin temperature non-invasively at intervals of 30 seconds over a 24 hour period to obtain a representative and exact quantitative temperature profile. For this purpose we applied two thermoprobes externally to the scrotal skin. The data were recorded by the Thermoport device, developed and first introduced by Jockenhövel et al.21 This methodology permitted very accurate temperature measurements with minimal discomfort to the children. After the first communication of preliminary data at the Annual Meeting of the German Endocrine Society in March 1999, there has been considerable public interest in this study.22 As modern disposable plastic lined nappies are used by the vast majority of mothers for their infants in Germany, the interest has been widespread. Although there is an increasing number of alternative nappies, these are only used by a small minority of mothers.
The physiological temperature of the adult human testis has been reported as being between 31 and 35°C (table 2). To our knowledge, comparable data in healthy children are not available. One report on cryptorchid boys showed significantly higher testicular temperature on the cryptorchid than on the normally descended testis during operation.23 Similarly, significantly higher left testicular temperatures have been observed in patients with varicocele than in normal volunteers.24 An extensive review of the available literature (in part: table 2) showed that scrotal temperatures as high as those in infants wearing plastic lined nappies have not been observed before. In fact, the physiological cooling mechanism was blunted in all 48 boys wearing plastic lined, disposable nappies, and was completely abolished in 13 out of 48 (27%).
Even higher scrotal/testicular temperatures can be expected during the not infrequent feverish episodes in male infants and toddlers. In adults, short term testicular temperature elevations by sauna bath (elevation of rectal temperature by 0.93°C), or during acute febrile diseases were shown to suppress spermatogenesis.15 16 25 26 Thus, it seems to be possible that a prolonged and continuous elevation of testicular temperature by a mean of 1°C can affect the maturation of the infant testis. An increased testicular temperature and/or an impaired testiculoscrotal thermoregulation have deleterious effects on spermatogenesis.16 17 20 27 Moreover, mild testicular heating has been demonstrated to be effective as a means of reversible contraception in men.28 A lowering of the rectoscrotal temperature gradient in healthy men by 1°C to 2°C was accompanied by a suppression of spermatogenesis.20 27-29From these and other studies, it can be concluded that an increase of testicular temperature by 1°C and/or a decrease of the rectoscrotal temperature difference by 1 to 2°C is significant for spermatogenesis in men. However, it must be admitted that the impact of a temperature increase of the observed magnitude on the developing testis of the male infant is still unknown. In addition to the effects of increased testicular temperature on spermatogenesis, the former may be one of the aetiological factors in testicular malignancy.30
As has been recently shown, mechanisms of action of increased testicular temperature on testicular function and spermatogenesis include specific downregulation of messenger ribonucleic acid for the major sperm surface antigen CD5231 and/or of testicular androgen biosynthesis due to cytochrome P450c17 thermolability in Leydig cells.32 There is further evidence that heat shock inhibits the translation of messenger ribonucleic acid in testicular cells.33
While there is ample evidence for the biological significance of increased testicular temperature for male reproductive health, no such data are available in children. However, part of the deleterious effect of cryptorchidism on later spermatogenesis is believed to be due to increased testicular temperature.34 35 Furthermore, experimental primary cryptorchidism leads to early Sertoli and Leydig cell dysfunction and germ cell degeneration in immature rats.36 Similar findings were reported for newborn pigs.37 The fact that scrotal temperature is significantly increased in male neonates, infants, and toddlers wearing modern disposable plastic lined nappies, and that the physiological testicular cooling mechanism is significantly blunted during plastic nappy use may have a negative long term effect on testicular maturation and spermatogenesis and, in addition, may facilitate the development of testicular cancer. Furthermore, the much longer exposure time as a result of the prolonged use of disposable nappies, which are more comfortable for the children to wear and more convenient and time saving for the mothers, may aggravate the problem further.
Since disposable plastic lined nappies were introduced in industrialised countries about 25 years ago, the long term effects of increased scrotal temperature in early childhood will have to be studied in the generation of young men who have recently reached reproductive age. Thus, epidemiological studies of male reproductive health taking early childhood testicular temperature closely into account are needed to prove or disprove our hypothesis. Until the unification of Germany in 1990, there were marked differences in the types of and duration of nappy use in children between East and West Germany. East German children were trained to achieve bladder and bowel control from 10 months of age,38 whereas in West Germany, disposable plastic nappies were (and still are) used much longer, until age 3–4 years. In addition, modern disposable plastic lined nappies were available in East Germany much later than in West Germany. Thus, young men from both parts of Germany could be the appropriate population for a study of the effect of testicular temperature during early childhood on fertility. One could also discuss studies in the non-human primate, which has been shown to be a good preclinical model for human reproductive physiology and toxicology.39-41
The authors thank Dr Inge Quoβ, paediatrician in Bordesholm near Kiel, Germany, for valuable suggestions in the initiation of the study. The linguistic help of Joanna Voerste is gratefully acknowledged. The authors are grateful to all parents who participated with their children in the study.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.