rss
Arch Dis Child 2000;82:364-365 doi:10.1136/adc.82.5.364
  • Article

Anthropometric indices of failure to thrive

  1. Pauline Raynor,
  2. Mary C J Rudolf
  1. Department of Community Child Health, Belmont House, 3 Belmont Grove, Leeds LS2 9NP, UK
  1. Dr Rudolf email: mrudolf{at}ulth.northy.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 15 February 2000

Abstract

AIMS To compare five anthropometric methods of classifying failure to thrive in order to ascertain their relative merits in predicting developmental, dietary, and eating problems.

METHODS The five anthropometric methods were compared in 83 children with failure to thrive.

RESULTS The methods were inconsistent in classification of severity, and no one method was superior in predicting problems.

CONCLUSIONS Weight alone, being the simplest, is still the most reasonable marker for failure to thrive and associated problems.

Footnotes

    Responses to this article

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

    ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics