Article Text

PDF

Growth of long term survivors of liver transplantation
  1. R M Vinerb,
  2. J T M Fortona,
  3. T J Colec,
  4. I H Clarka,
  5. G Noble-Jamiesona,
  6. N D Barnesa
  1. aDepartment of Paediatrics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK, bDepartment of Adolescent Medicine, University College London Hospitals and Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK, cMRC-Dunn Nutrition Unit, Cambridge, UK
  1. Dr R M Viner, Director of Adolescent Medicine, Middlesex Hospital, Mortimer Street, London W1N 8AA, UK. email: R.Viner{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess growth in survivors of liver transplantation.

Study design—Growth was studied in 105 children up to seven years after liver transplantation.

Results—At transplantation, mean height standard deviation score (zH) was −1.22 but 19% of patients were severely growth retarded (height below 0.4th centile). Growth and pubertal retardation were seen in the first six months after liver transplantation. Significant catch up in growth and puberty continued for more than five years. At five years, mean zH was −0.95 and at seven years −0.84. The mean zH of patients at final height was −0.55. zH at six months was predicted by zH and bilirubin at the time of transplantation and prednisolone dose at six months. At four years, zH was predicted by zH at the time of transplantation and the cumulative prednisolone dose. There was no association between zH and age at transplantation, sex, or diagnosis, although those with biliary atresia and those undergoing transplantation under 2 years of age showed more initial growth delay and subsequent catch up. Average age at menarche was 14.2 years.

Conclusions—The mean height of the group to have reached final height after liver transplantation was on the 27th centile. Those transplanted earlier in childhood are likely to achieve more normal final heights. High steroid dose, poor liver function, and retransplantation are associated with poorer height outcomes. Persisting severe short stature is largely confined to children with severely retarded growth at the time of transplantation. Transient delay in puberty and menarche occur early after transplantation, although appropriate pubertal progress is resumed after two to three years.

  • Average final height after liver transplantation was on the 27th centile, although those undergoing transplantation as infants can achieve better final heights

  • Height at transplantation is the most important predictor of later height outcome, emphasising the need for optimal transplant timing and preoperative nutritional management

  • High steroid dose, poor liver function, and the need for a second transplant were associated with poor height outcome

  • Transplantation in infancy was not associated with poorer height outcomes

  • Normal pubertal progress was resumed three to five years after transplantation

  • growth
  • liver transplantation
  • long term survivors
  • puberty

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Liver transplantation is now the accepted treatment for children with end stage liver disease. It is hoped that successful transplantation will result not only in long term survival but also in normal growth and development. At present, few data are available on growth in long term survivors of transplantation. Most children who undergo transplantation already have moderate to severe growth failure.1-3 Further growth retardation is commonly seen in the first six months after transplantation but catch up growth often occurs from six to 24 months.4 5 To date, few studies have assessed growth more than two years after transplantation. Codoner-Franch et al found that mean height standard deviation scores (zH scores) in 119 children increased from −1.30 at liver transplantation to −0.99 at four years (n = 26), indicating a mean improvement of approximately half a centile channel.6 Rodeck et al found that the greatest height velocity during catch up growth was at two years, falling again in the third and fourth years.7 Most recently, Holt et al reported that mean height standard deviation score remained around −1.0 at five years after transplantation, although numbers at five years were small.8 No data exist on height outcomes beyond five years after transplantation.

Factors that may affect growth after transplantation include previous growth failure, feeding problems, transplantation complications and impairment of liver function,4 5 7 8 delayed development,9 renal impairment,3 and immunosuppression.10-13 High doses of glucocorticoids are a major factor responsible for poor linear growth in the first six months,6 9 and if it is necessary to continue with high doses, such doses also affect growth during the second and subsequent years.4 6 7 Concerns about growth suppression and increasing confidence in other agents have resulted in many clinicians reducing steroid doses, using alternate day regimens, and stopping steroids three to six months after transplantation.9Cyclosporin has not been associated with poor growth.4The primary diagnosis may be relevant, because rapid catch up has been reported in metabolic disorders, biliary atresia, antitrypsin deficiency, and cryptogenic cirrhosis, but not in Alagille syndrome or familial cirrhosis.5 6 14

There is also a lack of data on skeletal maturity and endocrine function. Growth potential as assessed by delay in bone age was reported to improve after liver transplantation.15 Studies of nocturnal growth hormone (GH) secretion showed a reduced mean area under the curve and low mean GH peak concentrations at 12 months, with low basal cortisol concentrations and blunted cortisol responses to adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) and hypoglycaemic stimulation.4 15 Corticosteroid stimulated somatostatin secretion might be the main cause of the suppression of growth hormone secretion.16 The relevance of impaired production of liver derived growth factors is being investigated.17

No data are available on the relation of long term growth and final height to parental heights, or on pubertal development in adolescents. The 12 year experience of the Addenbrooke’s children’s liver transplantation programme offered an opportunity to reassess long term growth taking these factors into account.

Methods

Data were collected retrospectively from the records of children who survived more than 12 months after orthotopic liver transplantation in Cambridge between August 1984 and August 1994. One year survival was 85%, and five year survival was 72%. Data were available for 105 patients. Three children with Alagille syndrome were excluded because they showed the growth failure associated with this condition.14 Table 1 summarises the clinical details of the patients. Anthropometric measurements described as taken at the time of liver transplantation were obtained in the two month period before the procedure. During the period of our study a triple immunosuppression regimen with cyclosporin, azathioprine, and prednisolone was used. Prednisolone was given initially at 2 mg/kg/day but the dose was reduced progressively from two weeks if there was no rejection and liver function was good. Figure 1 shows the mean prednisolone and cyclosporin doses. Azathioprine was given at a dose of 1.0–1.5 mg/kg/day and withdrawn at six months if no rejection was apparent. From January 1994 onward prednisolone was also stopped at three months in children with good graft function. Height was recorded at assessment and at all clinic visits. For the purpose of our study, height was recorded three monthly for the first 18 months, six monthly until three years, and yearly thereafter. At each visit, assessment included clinical examination, pubertal scoring, and anthropometry using a Harpenden stadiometer or Infantometer by one of three paediatricians. A patient was considered to have reached final height when at Tanner stage 5 and with height growth rate less than 0.5 cm in one year. Liver and renal function tests and a trough cyclosporin measurement were taken at each visit.

Table 1

Age, sex, and diagnosis of patients undergoing liver transplantation (n = 105)

Figure 1

Height standard deviation scores (zH), prednisolone, and cyclosporin during follow up.

In statistical comparison of the growth data, the z score, standardised against the 1990 British growth reference data,18 was used. Severe growth retardation was defined as height below the 0.4th centile. Midparental centile was calculated from parental heights and converted to a z score. Parental heights were measured where possible, but otherwise obtained by report from parents. Reported heights are less accurate than measured height, because subjects commonly overestimate their own and their spouses’ heights.19 The effect of this bias is reduced by converting midparental height to a z score. Mean height z scores during follow up were calculated using within-subjects regression to ensure that means were representative of the entire group. Catch up growth was defined by improvement in the zH score. Prednisolone doses were expressed as mg/kg/day for all children, including those on alternate day regimens. Tanner scores for pubertal staging were converted to z scores and a mean pubertal z score calculated by averaging breast and pubic hair scores for girls and genital, testicular, and pubic hair scores for boys. Comparison of groups was undertaken by unpaired t tests and ANOVA; groups with less than four subjects were discarded for categorical analyses. Continuous variables were analysed by pairedt tests and multiple regression analysis.20

Results

Table 1 gives clinical details of the patients’ sex, age bands, and diagnoses. Figure 1 shows the mean height z scores at liver transplantation and during follow up. The height of patients at transplantation was normally distributed. zH at transplantation was significantly below that of the general population (p < 0.0001). Sixteen patients were severely growth retarded, but 20 had a positive zH with a height over the 50th centile. The severely growth retarded group was not significantly different from the remainder of the patients with respect to diagnosis, age, or liver function at transplantation.

Growth retardation was seen in the first six months after liver transplantation (fig 1); zH fell significantly by 0.22 (p < 0.006) in the six months after transplantation. Significant catch up growth then occurred and was maximal from six months to two years (p < 0.01). In some patients, catch up growth continued until seven years, although the improvement in mean zH was significant only until five years after liver transplantation. zH at transplantation predicted 64% of the variance in zH at two years (F = 121; p < 0.0001) and 53% of zH at five years (F = 30.4; p < 0.0001). Of the patients who were severely growth retarded at liver transplantation, half remained so at four years (eight patients comprising 14% of the group at four years; diagnoses: five biliary atresia, one antitrypsin deficiency, one oxalosis, one tyrosinaemia; mean (SE) age at transplantation, 6.5 (1.7) years). Severe growth retardation at four years was not associated with an increase in post-transplant complications. There was no significant difference in zH during follow up for those undergoing transplantation before or after 1 January 1990, indicating that temporal changes in management were not responsible for the improvement in zH.

Parental heights were available for 66 patients. Midparental height was normally distributed and the mean (SD) midparental z score was −0.17 (0.81), which was not significantly different from the general population. At liver transplantation, eight children were severely growth retarded when adjusted for their midparental centile (below 0.4th centile for their midparental z score) and 28% remained so at four years after transplantation.

Final height was reached in 14 patients (six boys, eight girls; five with biliary atresia, four with antitrypsin deficiency, two with cystic fibrosis, and one each with chronic hepatitis, oxalosis, and familial hypercholesterolaemia; mean (SE) age at measurement, 17.5 (0.3) years). Mean (SD) final zH was −0.55 (0.29), which was achieved at a mean (SE) of 4.6 (0.5) years after transplantation. Mean (SE) midparental centile for this group was 0.11 (0.25). The mean (SE) final zH in this group was not significantly better than the mean (SE) zH at transplantation (−0.63 (0.34)). The mean (SE) age at transplantation in this group was 12.6 (0.4) years, which was significantly older than that for the remainder of the children (5.1 (0.4) years; F = 53; p < 0.0001).

Diagnosis was not significantly associated with zH at liver transplantation, although those with cystic fibrosis and antitrypsin deficiency tended to have better pretransplant heights compared with those with metabolic conditions and biliary atresia. Those with biliary atresia (59 patients) showed significantly greater catchdown growth at six months after transplantation (F = 8.3; p < 0.006), with a trend towards greater catch up at two years after transplantation. Those with metabolic conditions tended to show the least catch up, although this failed to reach significance. No significant differences were found between diagnoses in zH at six months after transplantation.

The mean (SD) age at transplantation was 6.1 (4.4) years for the entire group (range, 0.5–15.3 years). Twenty four patients (23%) underwent transplantation under the age of 2 years, 28 (26.5%) between 2 and 5 years, 28 (26.5%) between 5 and 10 years, and 25 (24%) over 10 years. Age at transplantation was not associated with zH at that time. Those undergoing transplantation under 2 years had significantly greater growth catchdown at six months after transplantation (F = 2.8; p < 0.05), and a trend towards greater catch up from six months to two years after transplantation. However, six months post-transplantation, age at transplantation was not significantly associated with zH during follow up. Sex was not associated with height outcomes.

Pubertal data was available for 35 patients (17 boys, 18 girls; 15 with biliary atresia, five with antitrypsin deficiency, four with chronic hepatitis, four with cystic fibrosis, three with familial cirrhosis, three with oxalosis, and one with tyrosinaemia; mean (SE) age at transplantation, 10.6 (0.45) years). Mean pubertal z score fell from −1.0 at transplantation to −1.11 at six months, and subsequently improved to −0.91 at 12 months, −0.27 at three years, and −0.3 at five years, although these changes were not significant. Insufficient data were available for analysis of pubertal z scores after five years post-transplantation. Pubertal z score during follow up was not significantly predicted by sex, age at transplantation, or diagnosis, and was not associated with height growth during follow up. Data on the menarche were available in 18 patients. Mean (SE) age at menarche was 14.4 years (0.4), with a range of 12.1–17.50 years, which was significantly delayed compared with the general population mean of 13.3 years (p < 0.02).21

Twenty nine children (27%) had a second transplant. In 15 of these children this was for acute perioperative events such as primary non-function of the liver and hepatic artery or portal vein thrombosis, and in 14 it was because of chronic rejection. The group who underwent retransplantation had a lower mean zH throughout follow up, although the need for a second liver transplant was significantly associated with poorer height growth only at three years after transplantation (ANOVA: F = 5.4; p < 0.02). Chronic rejection was not associated with height outcome.

Figure 1 shows prednisolone and cyclosporin doses. The mean prednisolone dose/kg/day corrected for time after liver transplantation did not vary significantly over the 10 year span of our study. The prednisolone dose at six months after transplantation was a significant predictor of zH from six months to six years (p < 0.01).

Multiple regression models were constructed for zH at six months and four years (table 2). Significant predictors for zH at six months were zH and bilirubin at transplantation, and prednisolone dose at six months. Factors that did not significantly predict zH at six months included age at transplantation, sex, diagnosis, cyclosporin dose and concentration, and the need for retransplantation. At four years, zH was predicted by zH at transplantation and the cumulative prednisolone dose at transplantation, but age, sex, diagnosis, liver function at transplantation, cyclosporin dose and concentration, and the need for retransplantation were not predictive.

Table 2

Multiple regression models of height standard deviation score (zH) 6 months and 4 years after liver transplantation

Discussion

In our study we assessed growth and pubertal development in children up to seven years after liver transplantation. Although numbers were relatively small five years after transplantation, we believe this is the first report of long term growth and final height after liver transplantation in children. Our use of within-subsets regression to calculate mean zH during follow up indicates that results in the later years after transplantation were representative of the population undergoing transplantation. Unlike some other studies that have excluded those with abnormal liver function, the inclusion of all survivors provides a profile of post-transplant growth in children with and without postoperative complications, and with normal and abnormal liver function.

The children undergoing transplantation were heterogeneous. Although the mean height for the whole group at transplantation was on the 11th centile, heights ranged from under the 0.4th to the 99.6th centiles. In contrast with previous reports that most children are severely growth retarded at the time of liver transplantation,3 4 7 15only 20% of our patients were severely growth retarded at that time. Indeed, when height was adjusted for midparental centile only 15% were severely growth retarded. The bias likely to result from overreporting of parental height suggests that this discrepancy between zH at liver transplantation and a child’s genetic potential might be overestimated. These differences from previous studies might reflect differences in the diagnostic profiles of the populations undergoing transplantation, differing policies on timing of transplantation and preoperative nutritional support, and failure to consider midparental centiles. The importance of pretransplant nutritional management and optimal timing of transplantation is emphasised by our finding that the height z score at transplantation was the most important predictor of later height outcome; indeed, children who were severely growth retarded at transplantation, in relation either to the midparental centile or the normal population, were over three times more likely to be severely growth retarded at four years.

Six to seven years after transplantation the mean height of the group stabilised at around four fifths of a standard deviation below that of the general population (that is, on the 22nd centile), having recovered only one third of their height deficit at transplantation. This is unsatisfactory compared with the normal population; however, the linear trend for improvement in zH visible from two to seven years after transplantation (significant until five years) suggests that further catch up will continue year upon year. This is particularly likely in those transplanted as infants, who have more opportunity to catch up.

The group who had reached final height showed no significant improvement from their pretransplantation zH, with mean final height just over half a standard deviation less tall than the normal population and a similar amount less tall than their midparental mean. Although this corresponds with a mean final height on the 27th centile, this result is again unsatisfactory compared with the general population. Reassuringly, these findings are not likely to be representative of all children undergoing liver transplantation, because the group at final height were mostly those transplanted in late childhood or early adolescence who had less opportunity for catch up growth. As noted above, the trend for continued catch up even at seven years after transplantation suggests that those transplanted in infancy are likely to reach final heights nearer to their genetic potential.

The pattern of growth retardation over the first six months, followed by catch up over the following 18 months, reflects the findings of other studies.4-6 As expected, high steroid doses and persisting liver dysfunction predicted growth failure at six months when controlled for other factors. Our finding that the growth suppressing effects of early high steroid doses remained apparent for up to five years was in contrast to previous studies in which it was reported that steroids affected growth for only two7 or three6 years. These findings give extra weight to immunosuppression policy changes using lower doses of prednisolone and stopping this agent as early as possible. However, continued catch up growth up to seven years after transplantation suggests that the adverse effects of steroids on height are mostly recoverable once the dose is reduced. The confirmation that cyclosporin did not affect height outcome was reassuring. The association of the need for retransplantation with poorer height outcomes is not surprising, given the deleterious effects of chronic rejection and the return to high steroid doses after the second graft.

Age at transplantation did not predict later height outcome, although those transplanted under 2 years of age experienced the greatest growth delay and subsequent catch up, confirming the report by Holtet al. 8 This finding is contrary to the recommendation by Codoner-Franch et al that transplantation under 2 years of age should be avoided because of its association with worse height outcomes.6 As noted previously, the finding that catch up growth continued up to seven years after transplantation suggests that transplantation in those with the greatest potential number of years for catch up promises the best height outcomes. Confirmation that transplantation in infancy preserves height potential is important, in that transplantation in infancy is now the preferred management of many conditions requiring liver transplantation.22

While those with biliary atresia showed the greatest initial growth delay and later catch up, diagnosis was not a significant predictor of later growth outcomes. Although numbers in each diagnostic group other than biliary atresia were small, this finding suggests that transplant related factors might outweigh diagnosis related factors in relation to growth. We did not confirm the suggestion that children with metabolic conditions might show the greatest catch up growth.6

Pubertal z scores followed a pattern similar to height scores, with a nadir at six to 12 months, followed by catch up up to five years after transplantation. The timing of menarche, was delayed by one year in comparison to recent British standards. Although pubertal z scores were not significantly associated with steroid dose or liver function, it is likely that the pattern of pubertal delay followed by catch up is related to the same factors as were identified for height growth. Reassuringly, pubertal z scores were essentially normal by five years after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean height of the small group of patients who have reached final height after liver transplantation since 1985 was on the 27th centile. Because catch up appears to continue until at least seven years after transplantation, those transplanted in early childhood are likely to achieve final heights nearer normal. We did not confirm previous findings that early transplantation might be associated with more severe growth failure. Indeed, there was a trend for younger patients to show greater catch up growth. Steroid dose, poor liver function, and the need for retransplantation each independently predicted worse height outcomes. Delay in pubertal development and menarche were common after liver transplantation, but appropriate pubertal progress was resumed after three to five years. Severe short stature after transplantation was mainly confined to those severely growth retarded at the time of transplantation, emphasising the need to preserve height potential by optimal pretransplant nutritional support and early transplantation. Further investigation of steroid growth suppression and of hepatic production of growth factors is needed, and a reassessment of height outcomes will be necessary when those undergoing transplant as infants reach final height.

References

View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.