Article Text


Birth weight and body fat distribution in adolescent girls
  1. M Barker,
  2. S Robinson,
  3. C Osmond,
  4. D J P Barker
  1. MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD
  1. Mary Barker.


OBJECTIVE To examine the association between birth weight and body fat distribution in a group of adolescent girls.

DESIGN A total of 216 white girls who were born in Southampton had their heights, weights, waist and hip circumferences, and skinfold thicknesses measured when they were aged between 14 and 16 years.

RESULTS The girls who were smallest at birth, but who were fattest at time of measurement were the most centrally obese. In girls whose body mass index was above the median (21 kg/m2), the subscapular to triceps skinfold ratio rose by 9% for every kilogram decrease in birth weight. Among overweight girls, with a body mass index over 25, the ratio rose by 27% for every kilogram decrease in birth weight.

CONCLUSION In adolescent girls, the tendency to store fat on the trunk rather than the limbs, seems to be programmed by growth in fetal life, and is most evident in those who are overweight.

  • birth weight
  • adolescence
  • body fat distribution

Statistics from

Low weight at birth is associated with the development of non-insulin dependent diabetes and the insulin resistance syndrome in adult life.1 Central obesity is a component of this syndrome. This is one of the observations that has led to the hypothesis that non-insulin dependent diabetes and cardiovascular disease are ‘programmed’ by events in fetal life that lead to persisting changes in the body’s structure and metabolic function.

A number of studies suggest that low birth weight is associated with a central pattern of fat distribution. Increased central fat deposition, indicated by a high ratio of subscapular to triceps skinfolds has been found in 7–12 year old children in the USA who were born small,2 and also in young adult Mexican-Americans.3 Higher waist circumference4 and higher waist to hip ratio5 6 have both been associated with low birth weight in adults. These findings suggest that impaired fetal growth leads to increased deposition of fat on the trunk in adult life. A recent case-control study of adolescents in the UK produced findings inconsistent with this hypothesis.7 There were no differences in the body fat distribution of low birthweight adolescent girls and boys and normal birthweight adolescent controls.7 Differences in study design make it difficult to compare the results of this study with others. We have therefore examined the association between birth weight and body fat distribution in a group of adolescent girls with a range of birth weights. The girls were at school in the south of England and took part in a nutrition survey.

Subjects and methods

A total of 348 white girls were recruited from five schools in the Southampton area to take part in a study of diet and body composition carried out between September 1995 and July 1996. The schools were chosen to give a mix of social classes. Girls between the ages of 14 and 16 were invited to take part; 83% of them agreed to do so. The study was explained to parents and girls, and each girl gave her written consent. Ethical approval was given by the Southampton and South-West Hampshire local research ethics committee.

Each girl completed a questionnaire asking where and when she was born, about her smoking habits and household composition, and about the occupation of her head of household. Maternity records of the mothers were located for 216 of the 242 singleton girls born locally (89%). Birth weight and gestational age at birth were abstracted. Current social class of the girls was assigned according to the occupation of the head of household. The occupations of head of household for 19 of the 216 girls could not be classified or were unknown.

Measurements were taken of each girl’s height and weight. Height was measured with a Harpenden portable stadiometer to the nearest 0.1 cm, and weight with a Seca scale to the nearest 0.1 kg. Waist and hip circumferences were measured with a steel tape to the nearest 0.1 cm. Skinfold thicknesses were measured to 0.1 mm on the non-dominant side of the body at the subscapular and triceps sites, and in the manner described by Durnin and Wormersley,8 using Harpenden callipers. Each skinfold measurement was taken in triplicate. Before the study began, field workers were trained and the measurement procedures standardised. Standardisation and retraining were carried out at three monthly intervals throughout the study.

The mean of the three skinfold measurements taken at each site was calculated and used in the analysis. The subscapular to triceps skinfold ratio was calculated as an index of truncal to peripheral adiposity after Haffner et al.9 The distributions of the skinfold values were skewed, and were therefore log transformed before analysis. Variables relating to current and early life factors were entered into a multiple regression analysis. Social class was treated as a dichotomous variable, manual versus non-manual households, in tests comparing means, and as a continuous variable in regression analyses.


Age and unadjusted anthropometric details for the 216 girls are given in table 1. There were 98 girls from manual (IIIm, IV, and V) households, and 99 from non-manual (I, II, and IIInm) households. Girls from manual households tended to be shorter and heavier than girls from non-manual households.

Table 1

Characteristics of the girls (n=216)

As expected, the triceps and subscapular skinfolds, the subscapular to triceps skinfold ratio and the waist to hip ratio were all positively related to body mass index, though the association with skinfold ratio was not statistically significant. Body mass index and skinfold thicknesses fell with increasing age, and values were therefore adjusted to 15.0 years in all subsequent analyses.

Birth weight was positively associated with body mass index (p = 0.08). After adjusting for body mass index, birth weight was negatively associated with both subscapular skinfold thickness (p = 0.02), and the subscapular to triceps ratio (p = 0.05). It was not associated with triceps skinfold thickness. Subscapular skinfold thickness increased by 7% for every kilogram decrease in birth weight (95% confidence interval (CI) 1% to 13%), while the ratio increased by 6% per kilogram decrease in birth weight (95% CI 0% to 12%). These associations were independent of the girl’s social class.

Table 2 shows the skinfold ratio by birth weight among girls below and above the median body mass (21 kg/m2). The association between birth weight and the skinfold ratio was strong in girls with body mass indices above the median, among whom there was an 9% increase in the skinfold ratio for every kilogram decrease in birth weight (p=0.02; 95% CI 1% to 16%). At body mass indices over 25, conventionally described as ‘overweight’, this pattern was even more marked. The skinfold ratio increased by 27% for every kilogram decrease in birth weight (p = 0.03, 95% CI 3% to 56%). The three girls who had body mass indices over 25 and birth weights below 3 kg had a mean skinfold ratio of 1.25.

Table 2

Mean (geometric) subscapular to triceps ratio by birth weight in girls above and below the median body mass index (numbers of girls in parantheses)

There were no associations between gestational age at birth and the girls’ anthropometry, even after allowing for body mass index. Inclusion of gestational age in the regression weakened, but did not change, the effect of birth weight on subscapular skinfold thicknesses or on the ratio of subscapular to triceps skinfolds.


We have studied birth weight and body fat distribution in girls aged between 14 and 16 years. Recent national statistics indicate that the mean height and weight of girls in our sample corresponds with that for girls of this age in southern England.10 In line with national trends, girls from manual households had a higher mean body mass index. The distribution of birth weight in the group was the same as that for all UK births at the time these girls were born.11

Birth weight was positively related to body mass index. After allowing for this, we found that low birth weight was associated with a tendency to store fat centrally, measured by an increased subscapular skinfold thickness and a higher ratio of subscapular to triceps skinfold thicknesses. These relationships were independent of the girls’ gestational age at birth and current social class. They confirm findings from two previous studies of children and young adults.2 3 The girls in our study were at varying stages of the adolescent growth spurt, when body fat distribution changes. This might weaken associations between birth weight and central fat deposition. In our study, low birth weight was not associated with an increased waist to hip ratio. Subscapular to triceps skinfold ratio and waist to hip ratio reflect different aspects of body fat distribution, and the association between low birth weight and high waist to hip ratio has only been described in older adults.4-6

Central fat deposition is associated with insulin resistance and an increased risk of non-insulin dependent diabetes in women, independently of overall level of body fatness.9 12 13Our data show that teenage girls in Britain who were small at birth but who are fatter at age 14 to 16 are already depositing fat centrally. Adolescence has been identified as a critical period for the development of obesity.14 A higher than average body mass in adolescence may therefore entrain a tendency to deposit fat centrally, which is initiated by undernutrition in fetal life. Because of its association with insulin resistance, the development of central obesity in young women may have implications not only for their long term health, but for the intrauterine development of their offspring. It may be important for girls who were small at birth to avoid becoming overweight.


We are grateful to all the girls who took part in the study, and to the schools for their cooperation. Fieldwork was carried out by Wendy Arnold, Valerie Davill, Lyn Greenaway, Julia Hammond, Amanda Jones, Ria Skelton, and Christine Weston. The study was funded by the Dunhill Medical Trust.


View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles