rss
Arch Dis Child 76:178-181 doi:10.1136/adc.76.3.178
  • Annotation

Preventative strategies on meningococcal disease

  1. R T MAYON-WHITE,
  2. P T HEATH
  1. Oxfordshire Department of Public Health
  2. Oxfordshire Health Authority
  3. Old Road, Headington
  4. Oxford OX3 7LG

      The dramatic occurrence of meningococcal disease challenges doctors and attracts intense public interest. It is treatable and preventable, so every death raises the question: Could this have been avoided? Last winter’s experience of clusters in schools was the latest round in a struggle to apply rational and effective policies to control disease and panic. A strategist planning to prevent the occurrence and damage of meningococcal disease has various forces to deploy: epidemiology, the recognition of people who are susceptible to infection, vaccines, antibiotics for prophylaxis and treatment, public awareness, and education of doctors and parents.The epidemiology of meningococcal infection is fundamental to any preventive strategy. The incidence in the UK is 2.5–3 cases/100 000/year, 1200 to 2000 cases, with exact numbers depending on case definitions and the year in question.1 2 The age specific annual incidence peaks at 6 months of age (50–60/100 000), falls to 2/100 000 at age 10 years, rises slightly to 5/100 000 in teenagers, and then falls to 1/100 000 in adults.3

      Meningococcal disease illustrates the two purposes of notification: to start public health action and to have statistics on incidence. The consultant in communicable disease control must be notified, to ensure that prophylaxis and advice is given to close contacts and that local general practitioners, schools, and nurseries are informed. A prevention strategy depends on a reliable count of cases. Notifications are an enduring source of statistics, but there has been under-reporting in the past. In the last three years there have been fewer laboratory isolates than notifications, which produced problems in the autumn of 1995 when the public were aware of clusters and an increase in notifications, which was not substantiated by laboratory reports.4 The only reliable way to enhance surveillance is to combine sources of data. The laboratory reporting system is accurate for diagnosis, but is an underestimate of incidence since the widespread use of preadmission penicillin, which reduces the proportion of laboratory confirmed cases. Caution in performing lumbar punctures on children may also reduce the numbers confirmed by microbiology. The gap can be reduced by serology, culturing throat swabs from patients on admission and by antigen detection (for example the polymerase chain reaction).5 Microscopy of fluid from purpuric lesions is a technique that is sometimes forgotten.

      Meningococci are spread by respiratory droplets from the nasopharynx. Disease, if it is going to occur, is within two to 10 days of contact. If illness does not occur, the exposed person who is colonised acquires immunity6 but becomes a possible source of infection to others who are exposed to his or her respiratory droplets.

      Meningococci are all members of one species, Neisseria meningitidis, and can be divided into groups according to polysaccharides in the cell wall: serogroups A, B, C, W135, and Y are well recognised causes of human disease. Group A meningococci are the cause of extensive epidemics in Africa which have spread to the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent.7 Group B meningococci are the commonest cause of disease in the Americas, Europe, and Australia; the group is further subdivided by type and subtype antigens. Group C meningococci have caused about a third of the cases in Europe and North America in recent years, including some outbreaks among teenagers and young adults.1 8

      Risk factors and special risk groups

      Besides the obvious factors of contact with someone carrying meningococci and a lack of immunity to the strains that are circulating in the community, other risk factors for meningitis are imprecise. Pre-existing respiratory disease, for example influenza, is a factor that could explain the seasonal variation.9 Overcrowding has been a factor known since the first world war. Smoking in household members increases the carriage rate10 and the risk of disease.11 International travel to areas where epidemics are occurring has increased the risk and spread of infection due to group A meningococci.7 Smoking and overcrowding are worth prevention strategies in their own right. Hygiene and vaccines have a part in the control of other factors, like influenza A and travel to epidemic areas.

      There are some reasons why a few people have a symptomatic illness and a very few have an overwhelming disease, when most of us have symptomless encounters with meningococci. Being very young (under 1 year) is an obvious factor. A familial deficiency of a terminal component (C7–C9) of complement is rare but multiplies the risk of meningococcal disease by 10 000. Disease is often milder, relapses are more common, and the age of onset is older in this group. Properdin deficiency increases the incidence and mortality of meningococcal disease.12 The tumour necrosis factor allele TNF2 has been recently reported as an association with more severe disease.13 Asplenism is another suspected reason, although the scale of the risk is uncertain. These people may be more difficult to protect by vaccination, although it should be offered. As with other infectious diseases, herd immunity may be needed to control spread and so protect these susceptible individuals.

      Primary prevention

      Primary prevention is aimed at vaccination and the avoidance of the conditions which encourage the spread of meningococci. As the highest age specific incidence is in children under 1 year, vaccination will be most effective when it can be given in infancy, ideally with the other childhood vaccines. Unfortunately there is no antigen common to all serogroups from which a vaccine can be easily derived. Polysaccharide vaccines are available against serogroups A, C, Y, and W135 strains. A single dose of group A polysaccharide vaccine for children over 18 months old, and two doses three months apart for infants, was protective in an epidemic in Finland in 1994–5.14 The group C component is only effective in children of 2 years and older, and the resulting immunity lasts three to five years15 in children under 4 years old.16 To overcome this, the polysaccharides may be conjugated to a protein, for example tetanus toxoid, which converts them to T cell dependent antigens, thus enhancing immunogenicity in infants and inducing immunological memory.17 Conjugated group C meningococcal vaccines are now undergoing clinical trials in infants. Experience with conjugated Haemophilus influenzaetype b vaccine has shown how successful this strategy might be. If the clinical trials have the expected result of showing that conjugated meningococcal C vaccine is safe and effective, there will be difficult strategic decisions to make. Assuming that conjugated meningococcal C vaccine will be included in the routine infant schedule, should there be a large ‘catch-up’ programme to vaccinate older children, and even university students? Should we ask for a combined conjugated meningococcal A and C vaccine, which would have more international appeal, but perhaps a higher cost? Will there be enough vaccine, the money and the staff available in the school health services and general practices to give the millions of doses that will be demanded? The vaccine that is now available in Britain is a mixture of unconjugated A and C polysaccharides. It is used for travellers abroad to countries where meningococcal A disease is epidemic and occasionally for the control of meningococcal C outbreaks, as described below under secondary prevention.

      The development of group B vaccines has been more difficult.18 19 The capsule of the group B meningococci is poorly immunogenic and the polysaccharide is antigenically similar to a human epitope. Linking the native group B polysaccharide to tetanus toxoid does not improve immunogenicity. A non-capsular vaccine that has shown some promise against group B disease is based on class 1 outer membrane proteins. Moderate efficacy was demonstrated in older children in Cuba, Brazil, and Norway, but once again protection was not given to children under 2 years of age.20 21 If the development of the Norwegian and other outer membrane protein group B vaccines is successful, the decisions on whom to vaccinate will be as difficult as for the conjugated meningococcal C vaccine.

      Secondary prevention

      The prevention of secondary cases attracts most public interest. As a strategy for prevention, it has serious limitations. As most of the cases are sporadic, secondary prevention can make a relatively small reduction to the incidence and mortality of meningococcal infection. The principle of secondary prevention is based on the observation that a second case occurs within a month in the same household or family of 1% of primary cases.22 The risk is highest in the first week after the first case, but because this risk extends beyond the incubation period, it is thought that secondary cases are often due to transmission within families after the primary case has been admitted to hospital. Treatment of the family is supposed to reduce this risk. It is also recommended that patients with meningococcal disease have chemoprophylaxis before going home. Doctors and the public often misunderstand that chemoprophylaxis is intended to stop spread from carriers, and not to treat early infection. Carriers are likely to be immune,6 and the most commonly used antibiotic, rifampicin, is not reliable for treating incubating infections. Penicillin should be used for treating patients with co-primary infection (that it is those with active disease at the time when the index case presents). Such cases are uncommon. The clinical features of early infection maybe unimpressive and vigilance is required. Some have taken this further and recommend a combination of chemoprophylaxis and early treatment for high risk contacts.23 There is no good evidence of the effectiveness of this approach, and guidelines should be as simple as possible.

      It is clear from the scale of the risk that one would have to do a very large trial to test the efficacy of secondary prevention. It is difficult to see how a controlled trial could now be conducted, but the question may become pressing. Uncontrolled use of antibiotics promotes antibiotic resistance. If rifampicin resistance should increase, following the pattern that occurred with sulphonamides, then trials may be necessary to show that drugs that are unlicensed for paediatric use, like ciprofloxacin, have benefits that outweigh the risks. Although the public demand that something should be done is understandable, mass prophylaxis is difficult to do well and increases expectations for similar action on the next occasion. There is substantial doubt about the value of wider use of prophylactic antibiotics. For example, the guidance that nursery school contacts should have chemoprophylaxis has been changed to advice that school and nursery contacts should be considered for prophylaxis only when there are two or more cases (a ‘cluster’) in a school or similar community within four weeks. If the second case is not the same serogroup or type, or if the diagnosis in one of the cases is unconfirmed, the cases should be treated as sporadic cases and not as a cluster. It must be emphasised that chemoprophylaxis is not foolproof and may fail because meningococci are not eradicated or carriers are not recognised. Failure to prevent secondary cases in families and a nursery have been recorded.24 25 Therefore chemoprophylaxis must be accompanied by clear advice on the signs of meningococcal disease, preferably using the leaflets produced by the National Meningitis Trust and the Meningitis Research Fund. When a single case occurs in a school or nursery, the other parents should be told about the diagnosis and the signs of meningitis and septicaemia, usually by a letter taken home at the end of school.

      The antibiotic usually chosen for chemoprophylaxis is rifampicin, because it clears carriage and because this antibiotic can be given to all ages.26 It should be prescribed twice daily for two days in the following doses: for adults and children over 12 years 600 mg (two capsules), for children 1–12 years 10 mg/kg, and for those under 1 year 5 mg/kg. The paediatric dosage needs to be simpler, because children’s weights are often not known in kilograms and fractions of teaspoons or capsules are difficult. Our own regimen is to use rifampicin syrup (100 mg in 5 ml) prescribing 50 mg (half a teaspoon) for children under 1 year, 100 mg (one teaspoon) for children age 1–5 years, 200 mg (two teaspoons) for children from 6–10 years, and 300 mg (one capsule or three teaspoons) for children aged 10–12 years. Another dosage is 3–11 months 40 mg (2 ml syrup); 1–5 years 150 mg (7.5 ml of syrup), 6–12 years 300 mg (one capsule).26 Ciprofloxacin for adults and teenagers in a single dose of 500 mg is a useful alternative because it is more available in general practice and because its administration is simpler when large numbers of contacts need to be treated, for example outbreaks in colleges and military camps. Another alternative, which is suitable for pregnant women, is one intramuscular injection of ceftriaxone 250 mg for adults and 125 mg for children less than 12 years.27 The doctors attending the patient in hospital can often prescribe for other members of the family; the general practitioner is equally appropriate. In some circumstances the consultant in communicable disease control will prescribe, especially when the close contacts are not in the same family. It is essential that the prescription is given with a clear explanation of its purpose and limitations, that the drug is taken, and that requests from others for prophylaxis are properly addressed.

      Vaccination of contacts and groups experiencing outbreaks of meningococcal disease has to be considered if the primary case has group C or group A disease. Vaccination of close contacts should be preceded by chemoprophylaxis. Vaccination protects the vaccinee within a week of the injection and lasts longer than chemoprophylaxis. It does not promote drug resistance and requires only a single administration. However, vaccination assumes that the index case’s serogroup is known, and least protects those most at risk, children under 2 years old. The decision to use meningococcal A and C vaccine to contain outbreaks is difficult, more so if there is a lack in confidence in public health services. It is costly to provide in an emergency, and can quickly exhaust the available stocks of A and C vaccine. If it is to be used, it is better given early, for example after the second case in a school or nursery. Further delay, with more cases, may lead to demands for mass vaccination. Such demand may arise in any case.28Clusters usually stop soon after they are recognised and the efficacy of mass vaccination is uncertain, although some persuasive examples are published.29 30

      Tertiary prevention

      Tertiary prevention refers to the prevention of death or complications in children with clinical infection. It is recommended in Britain that benzylpenicillin (or chloramphenicol if there is an allergy to penicillin) is given as soon as meningococcal infection is suspected, preferably before admission. The National Meningitis Trust and others have campaigned to teach parents and doctors to recognise meningococcal infection early. The emphasis on early diagnosis may heighten public anxiety. Publicity about selected cases of meningitis may imply that some places have a high risk, and miss the point that most cases are sporadic. The leaflets and stories in the press have alerted parents in some cases, but the case fatality rate has been slow to fall from 11%. Publicity can mislead by emphasising meningitis and neglecting the rash (haemorrhagic or maculopapular) of septicaemia.31 32 Less well described is the mildness of some cases who have symptoms and a rash untreated with antibiotics for several days and still make an uncomplicated recovery. If parents and doctors are to act quickly in order to prevent death and neurological damage, they must recognise that meningococcal disease can start as a mild non-specific febrile illness, without a diagnostic rash or the classical meningeal signs.

      Conclusion

      The necessity to ask the question ‘Could this be meningococcal disease?’ for all patients reveals the limitations of current meningococcal disease control. There is a real prospect of ‘bacterial meningitis’ vaccines for infants, using conjugate vaccines to coverH influenzae type b, group C meningococci, group A meningococci in epidemic areas, and the commoner types of pneumococci. After these vaccines are introduced, the untidy strategies of secondary prevention will still be needed until there is an effective group B meningococcal vaccine. Only then will we realise the dream of meningococcal disease prevention.

      References