Article Text

G78(P) Female genital mutilation (FGM) surveillance in under 16 years olds in the UK and Ireland
  1. D Hodes1,
  2. K Pall2,
  3. N Ayadi O’Donnell3,
  4. R Lynn4,
  5. A Armitage1,
  6. S Creighton1,
  7. G Debelle5,
  8. R Viner6
  1. 1Department of Paediatrics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  2. 2Research and Policy Division, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, London, UK
  3. 3Department of Paediatrics, Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
  4. 4British Paediatric Surveillance Unit, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, London, UK
  5. 5Children’s and Adolescent Services, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK
  6. 6Institute of Child Health, University College London, London UK


Aims This study aims to describe the presentation, incidence and clinical management of children with FGM in the UK and Ireland.

Methods Cases of FGM are reported using the established British Paediatric Surveillance Unit (BPSU) orange card system. The online data collection period is from November 2015–November 2016. The sexual referral centres (SARCS) have agreed to participate. The study also includes a 12 month follow up.

Results Of the 55 cases reported to the BPSU, 29 (53%) had confirmed FGM of which we are awaiting outstanding information, 20 were reported in error, or were duplicates, six questionnaires are incomplete. The results presented are interim findings on the 29. Of the completed questionnaire items, at the time of diagnosis all children were older than four years (n=26), most children were diagnosed at 4–6 years (n=7) or 13–16 years (n=7), followed by 7–9 years (n=6) and 10–12 years (n=6). Almost all children were born outside of the UK, in African countries (n=25). For confidentiality purposes we cannot disclose the place of birth for those children born outside of African countries (n=2), the place of birth was unknown for two cases. Social care referred most children (66%, n=19), and health professionals the remainder (34%, n=10) with a history of FGM (83%, n=26) or suspected FGM (n=<5). No children presented with a history of labioplasty or genital piercing. The circumstances of FGM were known in 19 cases of which 7 (32%) were performed by a healthcare professional either in a family members house/village (n=5) or clinic (n=2).

Conclusion The first year of reporting has shown that cases are being found and investigated. The reporting of clinical presentation and examination findings can be used to educate healthcare professionals and plan health services. The study extension will help to identify the true incidence, presentation and management of cases.

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.