Article Text

PDF
Letter
Bureaucracy, trust and time: recruitment in a low-risk study of paediatric protocols forchildren who miss medicalappointments
  1. Helen M Roberts1,
  2. Terence J Stephenson1,
  3. Lisa Arai2
  1. 1 UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
  2. 2 School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Helen M Roberts, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N1EH, UK; h.roberts{at}ucl.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

As Roe et al 1 point out, failing to ensure access to paediatric appointments has implications for a range of outcomes, including safeguarding. Here we report challenges we experienced in finding out from the frontline how protocols intended to address this problem are experienced on the ground.

Following our did not attend (DNA)2 3 studies, we reviewed recruitment notes on our attempts to talk to people tasked with producing or implementing these protocols. After speedy institutional ethics review, we required research and development (R&D) approval from each trust where we had identified a relevant DNA protocol in order to ask potential interviewees if we could talk to them. R&D contacts were helpful but risk-averse. Challenges included …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Atoms
    Martin Ward Platt