Responses

PDF

Natural course of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis in adolescents
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    A false equivalency between CFS/ME and CDF

    The title of the paper and the majority of the introduction imply that the study is about adolescents with CFS/ME. However, the final sentence of the introduction undermines that objective: “As children in our study were not examined by a physician, we have used the term ‘chronic disabling fatigue’ (CDF) rather than CFS/ME to indicate chronic fatigue that is disabling.”

    Those children may have had a variety of different diseases that cause prolonged fatigue, yet we are led to believe that a study of their collective conditions can somehow add to the body of literature on a specific disease process. CFS/ME is a highly contentious disease with a great deal of conflicting evidence and hypotheses; answers as to its exact nature and cause are as yet to be determined. By publishing a study of patients who are so poorly defined as to be undefined, Archives of Disease in Childhood has further muddied already murky waters. The addition of this study to the body of literature is not only unhelpful, but is actively detrimental to the pursuit of answers for patients with this highly disabling disease.

    How are ADC or the authors able to justify publishing a study that to all appearances is about CFS/ME, yet fails to properly assess if any of the study participants actually have CFS/ME?

    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.