Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Trends in Scottish newborn screening programme for congenital hypothyroidism 1980–2014: strategies for reducing age at notification after initial and repeat sampling
  1. Chourouk Mansour1,
  2. Yasmine Ouarezki2,
  3. Jeremy Jones3,
  4. Moira Fitch4,
  5. Sarah Smith4,
  6. Avril Mason3,
  7. Malcolm Donaldson5
  1. 1 Hôpital Universitaire d’Enfants Abderrahim Harouchi, Casablanca, Morocco
  2. 2 Etablissement Public Hospitalier Hassen-Badi, El-Harrach, Algiers, Algeria
  3. 3 NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Royal Hospital for Children, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
  4. 4 Newborn Screening Laboratory, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
  5. 5 Section of Child Health, Glasgow University School of Medicine, c/o Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Malcolm Donaldson, Section of Child Health, Glasgow University School of Medicine, Glasgow G12 8 QQ, UK; malcolm.donaldson{at}glasgow.ac.uk

Abstract

Objectives To determine ages at first capillary sampling and notification and age at notification after second sampling in Scottish newborns referred with elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH).

Subjects and methods Referrals between 1980 and 2014 inclusive were grouped into seven 5-year blocks and analysed according to agreed standards.

Results Of 2 116 132 newborn infants screened, 919 were referred with capillary TSH elevation ≥8 mU/L of whom 624 had definite (606) or probable (18) congenital hypothyroidism. Median age at first sampling fell from 7 to 5 days between 1980 and 2014 (standard 4–7 days), with 22, 8 and 3 infants sampled >7 days during 2000–2004, 2005–2009 and 2010–2014. Median age at notification was consistently ≤14 days, range falling during 2000–2004, 2005–2009 and 2010–2014 from 6 to 78, 7–52 and 7–32 days with 12 (14.6%), 6 (5.6%) and 5 (4.3%) infants notified >14 days. However 18/123 (14.6%) of infants undergoing second sampling from 2000 onwards breached the ≤26-day standard for notification. By 2010–2014, the 91 infants with confirmed congenital hypothyroidism had shown favourable median age at first sample (5 days) with start of treatment (10.5 days) approaching age at notification.

Conclusion Most standards for newborn thyroid screening are being met by the Scottish programme, but there is a need to reduce age range at notification, particularly following second sampling. Strategies to improve screening performance include carrying out initial capillary sampling as close to 96 hours as possible; introducing 6-day laboratory reporting and use of electronic transmission for communicating repeat requests.

  • Newborn Screening
  • Guthrie sample
  • capillary thyroid stimulating hormone
  • notification
  • free thyroxine
  • congenital hypothyroidism

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors CM and YO came as visiting fellows during the Spring of 2014 to collect data for the study in close collaboration with JJ, data manager for the thyroid screening database and SS in the Newborn Screening Department. In Spring 2016, CM returned to complete data collection for 2014 so that the study could comprise seven complete 5-year blocks. CM was aided by MF from Newborn Screening during SS' maternity leave. AM oversaw and approved the project with MD. MD wrote the body of the paper, incorporating data which had been collated and analysed by CM, YO and JJ. All authors read and approved the paper.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Detail has been removed from this case description/these case descriptions to ensure anonymity. The editors and reviewers have seen the detailed information available and are satisfied that the information backs up the case the authors are making.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.