Article Text

PDF
G81 SLEs: Supervised Learning Events or Suboptimal Learning Experiences?
  1. S Li
  1. Derbyshire Children’s Hospital, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK

Abstract

Aims Numerous studies have highlighted trainee dissatisfaction with workplace-based assessments (WPBAs), describing them as little more than a “box-ticking” exercise. Indeed use of the word “assessment” promotes a summative, rather than formative, purpose.

It is against this backdrop that in August 2013 changes were made to WPBAs, whose tools were largely renamed supervised learning events (SLEs), and their formative nature emphasised. This study examined whether this change in emphasis has resulted in changes in perceptions of SLEs amongst trainees.

Methods All UK paediatric trainees were invited to complete an online survey [www.surveymonkey.com] via the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health electronic portfolio messaging system. The survey was open for eight weeks from 1 October to 30 November 2015. Reminder messages were sent at weeks three and six to improve response rates. Quantitative analyses of Likert scale ratings were performed using Microsoft® Office Excel 2003. Qualitative analyses of free text responses were performed using NVivo for Mac.

Results 465 trainees consented to take part in the survey. Incomplete survey submissions were excluded from the study leaving 274 trainee responses for analysis. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate the range of responses to various statements. 77% of trainees agreed that SLEs were of educational value whilst 86% found the opportunity for face-to-face discussion useful. However 77% of trainees disagreed with the statement that they were easy to organise and this is further emphasised in Table 1 which highlights several problems trainees have with SLEs in their current form. These include difficulties in performing them and that there are too many SLEs to undertake. Worryingly 49% of trainees believe that they are used to assess their performance such that 46% of trainees choose assessors who will provide favourable feedback.

Conclusions The shift in emphasis from the summative to formative purpose of SLEs appears to have led to a more positive attitude towards them. However there are still a number of issues trainees have identified which require addressing if they are to become more accepted.

Abstract G81 Figure 1

Diverging stacked bar chart showing how strongly trainees felt about the SLE tools

Abstract G81 Figure 2

Diverging stacked bar chart showing how strongly trainees felt about their assessors

Abstract G81 Table 1

Themes and categories generated from the survey with exemplar comments

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.