Article Text

G325(P) Understanding uptake of immunisations in travelling and gypsy communities
  1. H Bedford1,
  2. H Beach2,
  3. F Cheater2,
  4. L Condon3,
  5. A Crocker4,
  6. L Dyson5,
  7. C Emslie6,
  8. S Kerr6,
  9. P Kemsley1,
  10. L Ireland6,
  11. H Lewis5,
  12. J Mytton7,
  13. K Overend5,
  14. S Redsell8,
  15. Z Richardson5,
  16. C Shepherd9,
  17. L Smith9,
  18. C Jackson5
  1. 1Population, Policy and Practice Programme, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK
  2. 2School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
  3. 3College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
  4. 4Gypsy and Traveller Team, Bristol City Council, Bristol, UK
  5. 5Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
  6. 6Institute for Applied Health Research, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
  7. 7Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
  8. 8Faculty of Health and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
  9. 9York Travellers' Trust, York, UK


Aims To investigate the barriers and facilitators to acceptability and uptake of immunisation among Gypsy/Traveller communities in the UK.

Methods We interviewed 174 Gypsy/Travellers from five communities: Romanian/Slovakian Roma, English Gypsy, Irish Travellers, English Roma, Scottish Showpeople, in four UK cities: Interviews gathered views about the influences on their immunisation behaviours (childhood, adult flu and pertussis vaccines) and ideas for improving uptake in their community. Interview data were analysed using the framework approach. The Social Ecological Model provided the theoretical framework.

Results General acceptance of immunisation based on social norms and trust in health professionals was expressed by approximately half of the participants from the English Roma and London Irish Traveller communities in two cities; three quarters of the English Gypsy/Irish Traveller community and Scottish Showpeople; and almost all of the Romanian/Slovakian Roma participants. Concerns about specific vaccines were evident for particular communities e.g. pertussis vaccine in pregnancy for the English/Irish Traveller community in one city, MMR for the Scottish Showpeople. A belief that having the HPV vaccination would imply that Traveller girls are promiscuous was evident for a minority of Travellers in four communities (not Scottish Showpeople). Romanian/Slovakian Roma communities identified language barriers to accessing immunisation services and low literacy across all communities resulted in people being unable to read immunisation leaflets or letters/texts about appointments and struggling to make sense of conversations with health professionals. Relationships with health professionals appeared to be very important. Recall and reminder systems (letters, texts, phone calls) were seen as effective for the majority of participants including those who regularly travel. Most did not appear to have problems with attending appointments for immunisations although some talked about the difficulty of registering with a GP practice without a fixed address and being unable to get an appointment within two weeks.

Conclusion Although these Travellers’ accounts of the barriers and facilitators to immunisation have consistency with the wider population, there are some important differences between communities. Immunisation services need to be aware of Gypsy/Traveller communities in their area and tailor services accordingly.

Statistics from

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.