Responses

PDF
Point-of-care lactate measurement in resource-poor settings
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Point of care lactate testing in resource-poor settings

    Khan et al. make a strong case for investment in point-of-care lactate testing in low and middle income countries (LMICs) (1). They believe that this would identify children at high risk of death, and would save lives because these children could receive earlier resuscitation. Unfortunately the optimal management of children with hyperlactataemia in LMICs is far from clear. Although Khan et al. extrapolate from findings i...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.