Responses

Download PDFPDF

G297(P) Use of email advice – line to improve management of children in the community
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Night activity Paediatric Consultant Advisory Service (PCAS) for General Practitioners in Oxfordshire: sweet-talk for healthcare & efficiency ?
    • Louise Hopkins, ST2 Doctor Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    • Other Contributors:
      • B. Rani Pal, Consultant Paediatrician

    Our Paediatric Consultant Advisory Service (PCAS) was set up in 2010 as communication between Oxfordshire General Practitioners and General Paediatricians to provide a cost-saving means of reducing the numbers of outpatient face-to-face attendees. Twelve General Paediatrician Consultants rostered for Resident-oncall night duty (21.00h-09.00h) respond to email queries from Oxfordshire GPs, aiming for a standard response within 24h period. Thirty-six GP surgeries utilised this email service and Resident Paediatric Consultants responded as part of Night activity a mean of 9 emails (median 8, range 3-20) during night hours. This confirmed that between 2011-2013 there was a five fold increase of number of GP advice-seeking emails (Annual Total for [2011-2012] was 156; for [2012-2013] was 780); between 2013-2016 emails have now doubled to 1800 emails per year (5,400 emails); there were only 2 Complaints, 15 Compliments to advisory service; the complexity of questions has emerged from 1-2 line questions in 2010-2011, to paragraphs, now seeking response to a range clinical questions entailing 10-12 lines and attached clinic consultation letters.
    Quality anlaysis of a 3 month period of audit (1st September – 30th November 2013), 122 email questions arrived: of these 81 (66%) were responded to within <24hours (set standard); 15 ( 12.3%) in 24-48h; 26 (21.3%) > 48hours. 6 did not have adequate patient details so did not receive first advice response; )
    Prev...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.