Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Unexplained fractures in infancy: looking for fragile bones
  1. Nick Bishop1,
  2. Alan Sprigg2,
  3. Ann Dalton3
  1. 1Academic Unit of Child Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK
  2. 2Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK
  3. 3Sheffield Molecular Genetics Service, Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr N Bishop
    Academic Unit of Child Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield S10 2TH, UK; n.j.bishop{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

A fracture occurs when the force exerted on a bone exceeds the ability of the bone to absorb the force by deforming. Fractures in children are common—approximately one third of children will have a fracture by 16 years of age, with more boys experiencing fracture than girls.1 This differentiation in fracture risk is apparent from 2 years of age. Before the age of 2 years, fracture incidence is equal and occurs at a rate of approximately 80/10 000 person years. For the UK, therefore, approximately 4800 infants will have a clinically evident fracture before their first birthday each year.

Some long-bone fractures may occur at birth2 in association with events such as shoulder dystocia3; skull fractures may occur during forceps4 and ventouse delivery.5 Some may (uncommonly) occur as a result of clearly defined trauma such as road accidents.6 Most, however, fall into the “unexplained” category. This article reviews our current approach to identifying bone disease in the infant presenting with more than one unexplained fractures, and discusses the recognised disease processes that result in increased bone fragility.

The history should include inquiry into specific areas as listed in the box. The two most frequently recognised underlying disease processes causing bone fragility in infancy are metabolic bone disease of prematurity7 and osteogenesis imperfecta, and directed questioning is appropriate for these conditions. For premature infants, the features commonly associated with fracture are delivery at <28 weeks of gestation, necrotising enterocolitis, late (>30 days) establishment of full enteral feeds, conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia, chronic lung disease, and use of furosemide.8,9 For a proportion of infants with osteogenesis imperfecta, there will be a family history either of osteogenesis imperfecta itself or of features that suggest osteogenesis imperfecta. The other elements of the history relating to the …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: NB receives grant support from the Arthritis Research Campaign and the Wellcome Trust to study bone disease in children and infants, and from Procter and Gamble, Sanofi-Aventis and Novartis pharmaceuticals to undertake studies of bisphosphonates in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. NB and AS undertake medical work remunerated through the Legal Aid Fund in the field of unexplained fractures in infancy. NB has a particular interest in the genetic causes of bone fragility in infancy and childhood. AD is director of the Sheffield Molecular Diagnostic Service, which provides testing of COL1A1 and COL1A2.

Linked Articles

  • Précis
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health