Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
To SUBMIT an e-letter please go to the abstract/full text of the article and click the 'Submit a response' link in the box to the right of the text. For further help click here.

* To: ADC Fetal and Neonatal Edition Letters and ADC Education and Practice Letters

Electronic Letters to:

S Banerjee, R J H Morgan, S A Rees, A H A Latif, and P Betts
Height screening at school: ineffective without high standards and adequate resources COMMENTARY
Arch Dis Child 2003; 88: 477-481 [Abstract] [Full text] [PDF]
*eLetters: Submit a response to this article

Electronic letters published:

[Read eLetter] Height screening at school
David M Hall, David Elliman, David Hall, and Linda Voss   (22 July 2003)

Height screening at school 22 July 2003
  Top
David M Hall,
Paediatrician
Sheffield University,
David Elliman, David Hall, and Linda Voss

Send letter to journal:
Re: Height screening at school

d.hall{at}sheffield.ac.uk David M Hall, et al.

Dear Editor

We applaud the honesty of Banerjee et al. in reporting on their review of community height screening. They found that the quality of measurement was poor but perhaps this is not surprising, since there seems to have been little investment in training or quality monitoring. We wish to make two points in reply to the commentary by Betts.

Firstly, we emphasise that the reason we have questioned the value of whole-population growth monitoring [1] is not that measuring is often badly done. Technique could undoubtedly be improved. It is rather that when analysed as a screening process, the maximum potential yield, sensitivity and specificity of growth monitoring are disappointing, even when carried out to a high standard.

Second, we have looked in detail at the question of obtaining mid- parental height to improve the performance of growth screening in the community. We concluded that the judgements that have to be made require a degree of sophistication that belongs, for the present, in a specialist clinic, not in whole population screening programmes. Indeed, the value of target height in detecting 'hidden' pathology was recently examined in a cohort of short children and its usefulness called into question.[2]

The essential ingredients for early recognition of abnormal growth are a knowledge of how to assess growth as part of routine paediatric consultation in primary care, a readiness to listen to parental worries and quick, easy referral to specialist services when in doubt. Current evidence suggests that the additional yield of a whole-population growth screening programme would be modest and that a high price would be paid in false positives.

David Elliman
Consultant in Community Child Health, Islington PCT and Great Ormond Street Hospital

David Hall
Professor of community paediatrics, Sheffield

Linda D Voss PhD
Peninsula Medical School, Plymouth Campus

References

(1) Hall DMB and Elliman D (Eds) Health For All Children. 4th edition. Oxford: OUP; 2003.

(2) Mulligan J and Voss LD, Non-familial short stature. Arch Dis Child 2000;83:369

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs