Methodology
Lung deposition of aerosol
a comparison of different spacers
H J Zar, E G Weinberg, H J Binns, F Gallie, M D Mann
Department of
Paediatrics and Child Health, Red Cross War Memorial Children's
Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Correspondence to: Dr H Zar, Child Health Unit, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa email: heather{at}rmh.uct.ac.za
Accepted 4 February
2000
AIMS
To investigate (1) aerosol
lung deposition obtained from two small volume conventional spacers
(Babyhaler and Aerochamber) and a home made spacer (modified 500 ml
plastic cold drink bottle); (2) the effect of using a face mask or
mouthpiece; and (3) the relation between age and pulmonary deposition.
METHODS
Lung deposition of
aerosolised technetium-99m DTPA inhaled via spacer was measured in 40 children aged 3-7 years with stable asthma. Each patient performed
sequential randomly assigned inhalations using two spacers. Three
studies were performed: Babyhaler compared to Aerochamber (with
facemasks); Babyhaler with facemask compared to Babyhaler with
mouthpiece; and Babyhaler with mouthpiece compared to a 500 ml bottle.
RESULTS
Median lung aerosol
deposition from a Babyhaler and Aerochamber with masks were similar
(25% v 21%, p = 0.9). Aerosol lung deposition from a Babyhaler with mask compared to a Babyhaler with
mouthpiece was equivalent (26% v 26%,
p = 0.5). Lung deposition was higher from a 500 ml bottle compared to
a Babyhaler in both young (25% v 12.5%,
p = 0.005) and older children (42% v
22.5%, p = 0.003). A notable reduction in pulmonary deposition
occurred at 50 months of age.
CONCLUSION
A Babyhaler or
Aerochamber produce equivalent lung deposition of aerosol. There is no
difference in lung deposition when a mask or mouthpiece is used. A
modified 500 ml plastic bottle produces greater pulmonary aerosol
deposition than a conventional small volume spacer.
Keywords: spacer; pulmonary aerosol deposition
© 2000 by Archives of Disease in Childhood
Relevant Article
- HARVEY MARCOVITCH
Arch. Dis. Child. 2000 82: 0.[Extract] [Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Zar, H J, Streun, S, Levin, M, Weinberg, E G, Swingler, G H
(2007). Randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of a metered dose inhaler with bottle spacer for bronchodilator treatment in acute lower airway obstruction. Arch. Dis. Child.
92: 142-146
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
PEDERSEN, S.
(2001). Do Inhaled Corticosteroids Inhibit Growth in Children?. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
164: 521-535
[Full Text] -
ZAR, H J, MANN, M, WEINBERG, E G
(2001). Spacers and holding chambers: Not the last word, we hope{---}a reply. Arch. Dis. Child.
84: 281b-281
[Full Text] -
MITCHELL, J P
(2001). Spacers and holding chambers: Not the last word, we hope. Arch. Dis. Child.
84: 89j-89
[Full Text]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Should use of home-made spacers be incorporated into guidelines for asthma management?
- SK Agarwal
- ADC Online, 28 Jun 2000 [Full text]
- Spacers and holding chambers: Not the last word, we hope
- Jolyon P Mitchell
- ADC Online, 31 Jul 2000 [Full text]
- Re: Spacers and holding chambers: Not the last word, we hope
- Heather Zar
- ADC Online, 3 Aug 2000 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



