Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 July 2009

Arch Dis Child. Published Online First: 1 August 2008. doi:10.1136/adc.2007.137026
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

Original articles

A Simplified Gentamicin Dosing Chart is Quicker and More Accurate for Nurse Verification than the BNFc

Eileen H J Wong 1, Zoe Taylor 2, John Thompson 3 and David Tuthill 2*

1 Cardiff University School of Medicine, United Kingdom
2 Children's Hospital for Wales, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, United Kingdom
3 Cardiff University, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: david.tuthill{at}cardiffandvale.wales.nhs.uk.

Accepted 17 June 2008


Abstract

Background: At least 5% of all paediatric admissions are complicated by a medication error. Nurses can prevent some errors by correctly verifying prescriptions before administering drugs. To do so successfully requires adequate drug calculation skills and familiarity with the BNFc. We wished to explore whether a newly devised chart would improve their dose calculation ability and thus potentially reduce doctors’ prescription errors.

Aims: To explore nurses’ ability to calculate doses of gentamicin for neonates and children using a new simple dosing chart compared to the BNFc.

Methods: Two gentamicin dosing charts (paediatric and neonatal) were devised by a multidisciplinary group to simplify dose calculation and selection of frequency. These charts were compared with the BNFc using 4 questions (2 neonatal; 2 paediatric) asking ward nurses to correctly calculate gentamicin doses in their work environment. Answers were scored for both the correct dosage and frequency.

Results: 51 nurses participated. Only 11 nurses(22%) answered all 4 questions correctly. A higher proportion correctly answered both the dosage and frequency questions simultaneously when using the chart compared to the BNFc: paediatric questions 100%(51/51 chart) cf 80%(41/51 BNFc) [OR 0.20] and neonatal questions 55%(28/51 chart) cf 35%(18/51 BNFc) [OR 0.2]. Errors when using the BNFc were due to selection of the wrong regimen (23%), wrong frequency (17%) and one 10-fold dosing error. When using the chart, there were no dosing errors made, only frequency errors for the neonatal regimen.

Conclusion: The chart was more reliable, quicker and may be useful for patient safety. Revising the format of BNFc may be beneficial for nurses.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Children's Doses Should be Measurable
Neil A Caldwell, et al.
ADC Online, 6 Aug 2009 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs