Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 April 2009

Arch Dis Child. Published Online First: 17 November 2008. doi:10.1136/adc.2007.132290
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

Original articles

Do systemic symptoms predict the risk of kidney scarring after UTI?

Malcolm G Coulthard 1*, Heather J Lambert 1 and Michael J Keir 1

1 Royal Victoria Infirmary, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: malcolm.coulthard{at}nuth.nhs.uk.

Accepted 30 September 2008


Abstract

Background and aims: In the NICE guideline on childhood urinary tract infection (UTI), it is assumed that the presence or severity of systemic symptoms, especially fever, predict for renal scarring, and different management is recommended accordingly. We aimed to test this hypothesis by retrospective case-note analysis.

Design and subjects: We reviewed the notes of children that had been referred aged under 5 years with a first UTI, from a child population of 154,000, during 1992-5, and who were all assessed for scarring by dimercapto-succinic acid (DMSA) scanning.

Main outcome criteria: Ability to predict for single or multiple scarring from age, sex, fever, vomiting or anorexia or malaise, or need for hospitalisation, within the age-bands used by NICE.

Results: The 51 scarred and 140 unscarred children had a similar sex ratio (girls 65% and 69% respectively). Fever, systemic symptoms and hospitalisation were all commoner among younger children (comparing <6 m vs 6 m–3 yr vs >3 yr; fever 0.67 vs 0.38 vs 0.38; systemic symptoms 0.78 vs 0.62 vs 0.43; hospitalisation 0.67 vs 0.29 vs 0.19; P<0.001 for all). Having vomiting, anorexia or malaise at presentation correlated weakly with single or multiple renal scarring (R2=0.03; P=0.02), but sex, age, fever or hospitalisation did not (P>0.5 for all). Sensitivity and specificity data, and plots of proportionate reduction of uncertainty (PRU) showed that none of these variables was useful to predict for any degree of scarring in children under 3 years, and that they were only weakly predictive in older children.

Conclusions: Clinical signs at presentation in childhood UTI cannot be used to predict for mild or multiple scarring, and should not be used to guide management. NICE's recommendation to do so are not justified.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Another question for NICE on UTI Guide?
Dr Egware Odeka frcp,frcpch
ADC Online, 27 Apr 2009 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs