|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original articles |
1 Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
2 TNO Quality of Life, Netherlands
3 Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stef.vanbuuren{at}tno.nl.
Accepted 6 September 2007
| Abstract |
|---|
Objective: To establish an evidence-based guideline for growth monitoring on a population basis.
Study design: Several auxological referral criteria were formulated and applied to longitudinal growth data from four different patient groups and from three samples from the general population.
Results: Almost 30% of pathology can be detected by height standard deviation score (HSDS) below -3 or at least two observations of HSDS below -2.5 at a low false-positive rate (<1%) in 0-3 year old infants. For 3-10 year olds, a rule concerning distance to target height of >2 SD for those with HSDS < -2.0 has the best predictive value. After adding a rule concerning severe short stature (<-2.5 SDS) and a rule on slowed growth, 85.7% of children with Turner's syndrome and 76.5% of short children due to various disorders are detected at a false-positive rate of 1.5-2%.
Conclusion: The proposed guideline for growth monitoring shows a high sensitivity at an acceptably low false-positive rate in 3-10 year old children. Distance to target height is the most important criterion. Below the age of 3 years the sensitivity is considerably lower. The resulting flow chart can help practitioners in industrialized countries, but requires further testing in other populations.
Keywords: body height, childhood, growth disorders, screening
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Fry If it's worth doing, let's do it! Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2008; 93(4): 267 - 268. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | REGISTER |
| ARCH DIS CHILD | FETAL NEONATAL ED | ED PRACTICE |