Arch Dis Child. Published Online First: 9 January 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.107284
Original articles |
Weight estimation in resuscitation: is the current formula still valid?
1 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
2 Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: paruabay{at}btinternet.com.
Accepted 14 December 2006
Abstract
Objectives: To gather data on ages and weights of paediatric patients aged between 1 and 10 years old, and to compare this with the current weight estimation formula Weight(kg)=2(Age+4). If a significant difference was found, the data would be used to derive a more accurate formula.
Design: Retrospective study using data collected from paediatric attendances at an Emergency department (ED).
Setting: A large ED in a major UK city, treating both children and adults.
Patients: 17244 children aged 1 to 10 years, attending the ED between June-December 2005.
Main Outcome Measures: Weight difference between the measured weight and the expected weight, the latter given by Weight=2(Age+4).
Results: Seriously ill childrens weights were recorded in only 41.5% of cases; necessitating a weight estimate in the remainder. The formula "Weight=2(Age+4)" underestimated childrens weights by a mean of 18.8% (95% CI = 18.42% to 19.18%). Using linear regression and analysis of each individual age group, ten new formulae were tested. Of these formulae, "Weight (kg) = 3(Age)+7" proved most accurate with a mean underestimate of just 2.48% (95%CI = 2.17% to 2.79%).
Conclusions: Weight estimation remains of paramount importance in paediatric resuscitation. This study shows that the current estimation formula provides a significant underestimate of childrens weights. When used to calculate drug and fluid dosages this may lead to the under-resuscitation of a critically ill child. The formula Weight(kg)= 3(Age)+7 provided a safe and more accurate estimate. It is a simple, safe estimate of the weight of todays child. Notes: 95%CI = 95% Confidence Interval.
Keywords: child, estimation, formula, resuscitation, weight
Relevant Articles
- Atoms
- Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: 377a.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
-
A brief digest of the May issue
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: e5.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sandell, J M, Charman, S C
(2009). Can age-based estimates of weight be safely used when resuscitating children?. Emerg. Med. J.
26: 43-47
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Anderson, M.
(2007). Underestimation potentially better than overestimation. Arch. Dis. Child.
92: 937-937
[Full Text] -
Pollock, L., Molyneux, E., Jefferis, O., Bunn, J.
(2007). Estimating children's weights: a developing country perspective. Arch. Dis. Child.
92: 938-939
[Full Text] -
Cattermole, G, Wyatt, J
(2007). Sophia. Emerg. Med. J.
24: 608-608
[Full Text]
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Underestimation potentially better than overestimation
- Mark Anderson
- ADC Online, 17 May 2007 [Full text]
- The Formula (Age x 3) + 7, Is A More Accurate Estimate Of Weight In Children.
- Talat Mushtaq, et al.
- ADC Online, 5 Jun 2007 [Full text]
- Estimating children's weights: a developing country perspective
- Louisa Pollock, et al.
- ADC Online, 12 Jun 2007 [Full text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



