Arch Dis Child. Published Online First: 25 July 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.105528
Papers |
Named/designated doctor status and judgement in child protection scenarios
1 Royal Bolton Hospital, United Kingdom
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: simon.power{at}rbh.nhs.uk.
Accepted 10 July 2007
Abstract
4 child protection scenarios were sent to 200 named/designated and non-named/non-designated doctors. The respondents judged each scenario as abuse or accident and indicated their degree of certainty. There was a 71% response rate. There were no significant differences in judgement or degrees of certainty of judgement between the two groups.
Keywords: case scenarios, child protection, designated doctor, judgement, named doctor
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
- Atoms
- Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008 93: i.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
- Full Text (Rapid PDF)
-
All Versions of this Article:
adc.2006.105528v1
93/7/612 most recent - Submit a response
- Alert me when this article is cited
- Alert me when eLetters are posted
- Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
- Email this link to a friend
- Similar articles in ADC Online
- Similar articles in PubMed
- Add article to my folders
- Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
