ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
[Advanced]

The most recent version of this article was published on 1 December 2007

Arch Dis Child. Published Online First: 11 July 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.103531
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2006.103531v1
92/12/1055    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliman, D. A.C.
Right arrow Articles by Bedford, H. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elliman, D. A.C.
Right arrow Articles by Bedford, H. E
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Articles

Leading articles

MMR: Where are we now?

David A.C. Elliman 1* and Helen E Bedford 2

1 GOSH, United Kingdom
2 Institute of Child Health,, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ellimd{at}gosh.nhs.uk.

Accepted 12 June 2007


*   Abstract

The combined MMR vaccine was introduced to UK in 1988 and uptake of the vaccine rose rapidly to a high of 92%. In 1992, brands containing the Urabe strain of the mumps vaccine virus were withdrawn after it was noted to be associated with an increased risk of aseptic meningitis.[1] This did not appear to have a deleterious effect on uptake. In 1995 a paper was published suggesting a link between measles vaccines and the development of bowel disorders in adulthood.[2] This was associated with a small decline in uptake of MMR vaccine. In 1998 the same group of researchers published observations of 12 children with pervasive developmental disorders and bowel disease and suggested that the latter may have led to the former.[3] In 8 children, the history of onset of symptoms coincided with receipt of MMR vaccine. Although the researchers stated in the paper: "We did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described.", and an accompanying commentary was heavily critical of any suggestion of such a link,[4] the story attracted much attention in the media. This was largely fuelled by a paragraph in the press release accompanying a press conference - "The majority opinion among the researchers involved in this study supports the continuation of MMR vaccination. Dr Wakefield feels that vaccination against the measles, mumps, and rubella infections should undoubtedly continue but until this issue is resolved by further research there is a case for separating the three vaccines into separate measles, mumps, and rubella components and giving them individually spaced by at least 1 year." [5] Subsequently, public confidence in the vaccine was dented and uptake of the vaccine in England fell to 79%, with some parents seeking the single antigen components. In this article we consider the evidence in relation to the proposed link, the effect the scare has had on the control of measles, mumps and rubella and the current situation.


Keywords: MMR, measles, mumps, rubella, vaccine uptake


Relevant Articles

Atoms
Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: 1051. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

A brief digest of the December issue
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: e12. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
P. McIntyre and J. Leask
Improving uptake of MMR vaccine
BMJ, April 5, 2008; 336(7647): 729 - 730.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health