Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 May 2006

Arch Dis Child. Published Online First: 7 February 2006. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.088781
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

Original articles

A low-cost, color-coded, hand-held spring scale accurately categorises birth weight in low-resource settings

Luke C Mullany 1, Gary L Darmstadt 1*, Patricia Coffey 2, Subarna K Khatry 3, Steven C LeClerq 3 and James M Tielsch 1

1 Johns Hopkins University, United States
2 Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, United States
3 Nepal Nutrition Intervention Project, Sarlahi, Nepal

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gdarmsta{at}jhsph.edu.

Accepted 9 January 2006


Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of a low-cost, spring-calibrated, hand-held scale in classifying newborns into three weight categories (> 2500 g, 2000-2499 g, < 2000 g).

Design: Study of diagnostic accuracy. The test device was compared to a gold standard digital baby scale with precision to 2 g.

Setting: Sarlahi district, Nepal, March-June 2004. Participants: 1890 newborns were eligible for the study. Measurements were collected for both the test device and the digital scale from 1820 (96.3%) newborns.

Main Outcome Measures: The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the test device were estimated using the digital scale measurements as the gold standard.

Results: The overall LBW prevalence rate for the gold standard digital scale was 28.1% (511/1820). Sensitivity (93.7%) and specificity (97.6%) of the test device was high compared to LBW classifications based on digital weight measurements. Classification of infants into the < 2000 g category was 5.0% and 4.7% for the gold standard and test device, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of the test device in identifying infants < 2000 g was 87.8% and 99.6%, respectively. Positive predictive values were high (>91%) for both weight categories.

Conclusions: This low-cost, simple-to-use device classified infants into weight categories with a high degree of consistency and accuracy that exceeds that of surrogate measures. This new device is useful for identifying and targeting life-saving interventions for LBW, high-risk infants in settings where infants are born in the home and conventional weighing scales are unavailable.

Keywords: low birth weight, neonatal, scale, sensitivity and specificity, validity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs