Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 11 August 2006. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.101642
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2007;92:142-146
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of a metered dose inhaler with bottle spacer for bronchodilator treatment in acute lower airway obstruction

H J Zar, S Streun, M Levin, E G Weinberg, G H Swingler

School of Child and Adolescent Health, Red Cross Children’s Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Correspondence to:
Professor H Zar
Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital, University of Cape Town, 5th floor ICH Building, Rondebosch 7700, Cape Town, South Africa; hzar{at}ich.uct.ac.za

Background: Inhaled bronchodilator treatment given via a metered dose inhaler (MDI) and spacer is optimal for relief of bronchoconstriction. Conventional spacers are expensive or unavailable in developing countries, but there is little information on the efficacy of low-cost spacers in young children.

Objective: To compare the response to bronchodilator treatment given via a conventional or a low-cost bottle spacer

Methods: A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of a conventional spacer compared with a bottle spacer for bronchodilator treatment in young children with acute lower airway obstruction. Bronchodilator treatment was given from an MDI via an Aerochamber or a bottle spacer. Clinical score and oximetry recording were carried out before and after 15 min of treatment. MDI–spacer treatment was repeated up to three times, depending on clinical response, after which nebulisation was used. The primary outcome was hospitalisation.

Results: 400 children, aged (median (25th–75th centile)) 12 (6–25) months, were enrolled. The number of children hospitalised (n = 60, 15%) was identical in the conventional and bottle spacer groups (n = 30, 15% in each). Secondary outcomes including change in clinical score (–2 (–3 to –1)), oxygen saturation (0 (–1 to 1)) and number of bronchodilator treatments (2 (1 to 3)) were similar in both groups. Oral corticosteroids, prescribed for 78 (19.5%) children, were given to a similar number in the conventional (37 (18.5%)) and bottle spacer groups (41 (20.5%)).

Conclusion: A low-cost bottle spacer is as effective as a conventional spacer for bronchodilator treatment in young children with acute obstruction of the lower airways.

Abbreviations: LAO, lower airway obstruction; MDI, metered dose inhaler


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Atoms
Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: 95. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

A brief digest of the February issue
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: e2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Heale, R. (2007). Delivery of a {beta}2 agonist by metered dose inhaler with a bottle spacer was equivalent to delivery by conventional spacer in young children with acute lower airway obstruction. Evid. Based Nurs. 10: 74-74 [Full Text]  
  • Donald, C., Wyatt, J. (2007). Sophia. Emerg. Med. J. 24: 452-452 [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Coffee cup Spacers versus Bottle spacers for MDIs
Nigel Speight
ADC Online, 19 Mar 2007 [Full text]
Re: Coffee cup Spacers versus Bottle spacers for MDIs
Heather J Zar, et al.
ADC Online, 28 Mar 2007 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs