PERSPECTIVES
Testing our understanding of tests
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr Bob Phillips, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York YO10 5DD, UK; bob.phillips@doctors.org.uk
Accepted 11 September 2008
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Doctors have a prime role as diagnosticians and are encouraged to practise evidence based medicine (EBM). The classic Bayesian formulation of evidence based diagnostic testing1 relies on the estimation of a pretest probability, modified by the probabilistic estimate of test accuracy to produce a post-test probability. If this is high enough to cross a "treatment threshold", then therapy is commenced. Alternatively, if it is low enough, then one disregards the possibility of the diagnosis.
This probability modifying philosophy of diagnosis isnt the only approach currently practiced in medicine. Other diagnostic traditions exist such as the "anatomical" (the neurologist asking, "What level is the spinal cord lesion at?"), the "criterion based" ("Do they score enough for Kawasaki disease?") and the "categorical" (a histopathologist asking, "Do those cells in that pattern looks like graft rejection?") and are useful at other times and in other ways.2 But, when you try to break things
Relevant Article
- The influence of types of decision support on physicians decision making
- C M Sox, J N Doctor, T D Koepsell, and D A Christakis
Arch. Dis. Child. 2009 94: 185-190.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



