Editorial
The continuing dilemma of competing interests
Correspondence to:
Howard Bauchner, Boston University School of Medicine/Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA and Editor-in-Chief, Archives of Disease in Childhood; howard.bauchner@bmc.org
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Virtually every peer reviewed journal, and certainly all BMJ Journals, including the Archives of Disease in Childhood, have statements that govern the declaration of competing interests. A competing interest exists "when professional judgment concerning a primary interest (such as patients welfare or the validity of research) may be influenced by a secondary interest (such as financial gain or personal rivalry)" (see http://resources.bmj.com/bmj/authors/checklists-forms/competing-interests). Most of these rules are clear: if an author has received a fee for consulting or speaking, or reimbursement for attending a symposium from an organisation that may in any way gain or lose financially as the result of a publication, the author must declare a competing interest. Similarly, authors should always declare the sources of funding for research. In many respects, these are easy rules – virtually no one would dispute that speaking fees or stock options are examples of conflicts and should be declared
Relevant Article
- Atoms
- Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008 93: 1.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



