Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2008;93:549-551; doi:10.1136/adc.2007.136010
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

Perspectives

WHO Child Growth Standards in action

Stef van Buuren1,2, Jacobus P van Wouwe1

1 Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Quality of Life, Leiden, The Netherlands
2 University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Correspondence to:
Professor Stef van Buuren, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research TNO, Quality of Life, PO Box 2215, 2301 CE Leiden, The Netherlands; stef.vanbuuren@tno.nl

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In 1994 the World Health Organization (WHO) began planning for new growth standards. The main motivation came from the observation that clinically significant differences exist between the growth patterns of healthy breastfed infants and the NCHS/WHO international growth references. The WHO recognised that growth references are often used as standards, that is, as tools that enable assessment of how children ought to grow rather than describing how they grew at a particular time and place. A global standard emphasises the notion that all humans are equal. The key assumption underlying the work is that growth is driven by the environment, more particularly, "the biological reality that environmental differences rather than genetic endowments are the principal determinants of disparities in physical growth".1

The Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS; 1997–2003) collected data on the growth of 8500 children aged 0–5 years from six sites with various ethnic backgrounds and cultural settings (Brazil, . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Atoms
Howard Bauchner
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008 93: i. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Are universal standards for optimal infant growth appropriate? Evidence from a Hong Kong Chinese birth cohort
L L Hui, C M Schooling, B J Cowling, S S L Leung, T H Lam, and G M Leung
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008 93: 561-565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Implications of adopting the WHO 2006 Child Growth Standard in the UK: two prospective cohort studies
C Wright, R Lakshman, P Emmett, and K K Ong
Arch. Dis. Child. 2008 93: 566-569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs