ADC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Archives of Disease in Childhood 2007;92:472-474; doi:10.1136/adc.2007.115659
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clayden, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clayden, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, A.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Articles

PERSPECTIVE

Constipation and incontinence

Constipation and incontinence in childhood: two sides of the same coin?

Graham Clayden, Anne Wright

King’s College London and the Evelina Children’s Hospital of Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Graham Clayden
King’s College London and the Evelina Children’s Hospital of Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK; graham.clayden@kcl.ac.uk


Perspective on the paper by Loening-Baucke (see page486)

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The relationship between constipation and faecal and urinary retention is very familiar to paediatricians, but the prevalence of these distressing symptoms appears to vary in the medical literature. We will explore the background to the development of continence and how this may be disturbed by constipation.


REFLECTION ON THE ARTICLE
As Loening-Baucke stresses in the article, the problem with literature review has been the lack of an agreed set of definitions for constipation. The Paris consensus has improved on the Rome II definitions and she has shown how valuable it is to apply these even in a retrospective notes survey.1 Her study also avoids the problem of extrapolating data from a referral centre to the whole community. As with any epidemiological study there may be characteristics of the community being studied that limit its generalisability. Loening-Baucke’s population is based on a university and so may not have an average socio-economic profile. . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Articles

A brief digest of the June issue
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: e6. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Prevalence rates for constipation and faecal and urinary incontinence
Vera Loening-Baucke
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: 486-489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health