LEADING ARTICLE
Leading article
How good is the evidence available in child protection?
Department of Child Health, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Alison M Kemp
Department of Child Health, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN; kempam@cardiff.ac.uk
Accepted 13 October 2006
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
There is little doubt that the attitude of most paediatricians to child protection has changed since the travails of Roy Meadow and David Southall. However, those involved in giving evidence in court may have noticed increasing difficulties before then.
Twenty years ago, child abuse was seen and managed in the general paediatric ward, often used as a "place of safety" while complex clinical and social issues were dealt with. Paediatricians and the Children Act 1989 recognised that hospitalisation was inappropriate for most child protection cases, and as paediatrics became a field of subspecialties, child protection became the domain of community paediatricians. This has to some extent led to a deskilling of general paediatricians who have lost confidence in the field, further compounded by recent high-profile legal cases.
The legal system evolved so that, in any but the most straightforward child protection cases, the examining paediatrician gave little more
Relevant Article
-
A brief digest of the February issue
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: e2.[Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Schryer, C. F., Afros, E., Mian, M., Spafford, M., Lingard, L.
(2009). The Trial of the Expert Witness: Negotiating Credibility in Child Abuse Correspondence. Written Communication
26: 215-246
[Abstract] -
Sege, R. D, Flaherty, E. G
(2008). Forty years later: inconsistencies in reporting of child abuse. Arch. Dis. Child.
93: 822-824
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



