Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood 2007;92:107-108; doi:10.1136/adc.2006.110627
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

LEADING ARTICLE

Leading article

How good is the evidence available in child protection?

Jonathan R Sibert, Sabine A Maguire, Alison Mary Kemp

Department of Child Health, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Alison M Kemp
Department of Child Health, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN; kempam@cardiff.ac.uk

Accepted 13 October 2006

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

There is little doubt that the attitude of most paediatricians to child protection has changed since the travails of Roy Meadow and David Southall. However, those involved in giving evidence in court may have noticed increasing difficulties before then.

Twenty years ago, child abuse was seen and managed in the general paediatric ward, often used as a "place of safety" while complex clinical and social issues were dealt with. Paediatricians and the Children Act 1989 recognised that hospitalisation was inappropriate for most child protection cases, and as paediatrics became a field of subspecialties, child protection became the domain of community paediatricians. This has to some extent led to a deskilling of general paediatricians who have lost confidence in the field, further compounded by recent high-profile legal cases.

The legal system evolved so that, in any but the most straightforward child protection cases, the examining paediatrician gave little more . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

A brief digest of the February issue
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007 92: e2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Schryer, C. F., Afros, E., Mian, M., Spafford, M., Lingard, L. (2009). The Trial of the Expert Witness: Negotiating Credibility in Child Abuse Correspondence. Written Communication 26: 215-246 [Abstract]  
  • Sege, R. D, Flaherty, E. G (2008). Forty years later: inconsistencies in reporting of child abuse. Arch. Dis. Child. 93: 822-824 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs